Question: Does Collazo's performance tonight make Hatton's win over Collazo better?
Collapse
-
-
No
1. He lost again
2. Berto isnt yet near Hatton's level P4P, so a guy he barely beat barely losing to a guy who isnt yet at the level of Hatton doesnt equate to alot.Comment
-
Thats ture, But Most people thought Collazo won the fight against Berto, while the fight against Hatton was close too it seems like most thought Hatton won by looking at the polls.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Collazo beat berto just like he beat hatton. He has really bad luck
idiots that had ricky winning deny the knockdown they didnt countComment
-
i know that was a clear knockdown in the 12th round. collazo unloaded a combination on hattons exposed face and as he was falling down tried to grab onto collazo but failed and hit the canvas.Comment
-
Every article about Collazo now says that he should had beaten Berto and Hatton. A lot of people and analyst Had Collazo beating Hatton.Comment
-
Hatton fought Collazo (who was a WW champion at the time) on short notice as his first fight moving up in weight. The fight was close and Collazo hurt Hatton in 2 rounds but Hatton still won 6 or 7 rounds and scored a knockdown, so it wasn't a "robbery" in any way, shape or form! Collazo did better than most expected against Hatton which is why some argue/think he won. Most posters who claim this are extremely biased trolls.
The Berto fight confirms that Collazo isn't a "bum" that people here were saying he was when Hatton beat him.
FTR, a fight that can be scored a draw or 1-2 points either way, can not be a robbery, it's just a close fight and in any close fights biased people (like Kellerman) will claim their boy got "ripped off"...Comment
Comment