I Just watched Berto Collazo again!!!!!!!

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

I scored it 114-113 for Berto.

Anyways

You are a Cotto fan. You talking like the Mosley fight wasn't close. It should have been a draw. How about Tito's over Oscar

Of course the Mosley fight was close as hell. Oscar ran for 4 straight rounds thats a ***** move. And third you are a fan of the P4P biggest ***** in the sport, STHU!!!!!!!!

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Good point, I'd like to hear his take on this. Mosley/Cotto in a way is the equivelant of tonight's Berto/Collazo fight. A close fight which I saw Cotto winning but a fight that many saw Mosley win also.

I suppose using the compubox would be of good use in that fight because Cotto did land more then Mosley eh.

It was very close but the rounds that ech fighter won, they won them clearly so, whats your point? Like I told you I barely pay attetion to compuBox numbers they are ******ed as hell!!!!!!

[Vladimir303]

Taking rounds off is part of controlling the fight, because if you are not in controlled, the the other guy will make you fight in that round and dont let you get the rest you are looking for. So taking a round of it is poart of controlling the fight!!!!! Collazo landed a lot of straight left and right hooks to the head and body. If you only saw one hard punch from Collazo the n you are blind as hell!!!!!!
Look men. You know how ******ed Compubox is? I the DLH vs Trinidad fight, they had DLH throwing and landing more than Tito in the 12th round and DLH didnt threw a single punch in that round. Thats how ******ed they are!!!! By the way I thought that fight was a draw!!!

Forget compubox then, Nonetheless I didn't see Collazo controlling the fight. Are you saying Collazo let Berto win a few rounds on purpose? ROFL. Nobody was controlling it, hence the fight being as close it was that two judges saw it 114-113 and Lederman having it 114-113 for Collazo.

When you control the fight, you should be able to win the 12th round to make sure you don't get ROBBED. He didn't do that.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Forget compubox then, Nonetheless I didn't see Collazo controlling the fight. Are you saying Collazo let Berto win a few rounds? ROFL. Nobody was controlling it, hence the fight being as close it was that two judges saw it 114-113 and Lederman having it 114-113 for Collazo.

When you control the fight, you should be able to win the 12th round to make sure you don't get ROBBED. He didn't do that.

First Leaderman had it 115-112. Second. I will admit that Collazo was dead in the 12, he almost got drop. But besides that round wich other round didnt you see him doing what ever the hell he wanted?

[Vladimir303]

Of course the Mosley fight was close as hell. Oscar ran for 4 straight rounds thats a ***** move. And third you are a fan of the P4P biggest ***** in the sport, STHU!!!!!!!!

Yes it was close, so who won it? You had Cotto right, in a very close fight. You agreed with the judges but acknowledge that it was close.


So why is it so hard for you to believe that some had Berto winning in a really close fight?

[mspiegelo]

Which rounds did you give to Collazo? I gave Berto rounds 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12. Fourth round they took a point away from Berto for holding. So I had it 114-113 for Berto.

i had this same score. at first i thought collazo won, but that was probably coming from my heart. i watched it a second time trying to be unbiased and scored it for berto. he took the last round and, as a result, the fight, though the 6th could have arguably gone to lou...

it was a hell of a fight and lou has nothing to be ashamed of. i hope they do it again!

[Flawless.]

Yes it was close, so who won it? You got Cotto right, in a very close fight.


So why is it so hard for you to believe that some had Berto winning in a really close fight?

Thank you common sense wins

A close fight is not a ROBBERY

[Vladimir303]

First Leaderman had it 115-112. Second. I will admit that Collazo was dead in the 12, he almost got drop. But besides that round wich other round didnt you see him doing what ever the hell he wanted?

Plenty of rounds. If he did whatever he wanted, he would've won a 118-109 Unaminous decision. Or maybe a 116-111 decision because you know he let Berto win some rounds as part of him controling the fight.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Yes it was close, so who won it? You had Cotto right, in a very close fight. You agreed with the judges but acknowledge that it was close.


So why is it so hard for you to believe that some had Berto winning in a really close fight?

Because for me it wasnt as close. Collazo was like 4 points ahead going into the 12!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Vladimir303]

i had this same score. at first i thought collazo won, but that was probably coming from my heart. i watched it a second time trying to be unbiased and scored it for berto. he took the last round and, as a result, the fight, though the 6th could have arguably gone to lou...

it was a hell of a fight and lou has nothing to be ashamed of. i hope they do it again!

Thank You. A collazo fan giving it to Berto after rewatching it.


So what does that mean kids? That me and others who scored it for Berto are right and Ch@mpBox@PR is wrong.


NO.......it means that it was a close fight that could've gone either way. SO close that even a Collazo fan finally gave it to Berto. Although there are plenty of other Collazo fans with pictures of him in their avatar who gave it to Collazo.