Anyone actually seen the Chris John vs JMM fight?

[We want Floyd]

Oh, so NOW analyst and writer articles count right? But not when it comes to JMM and Pacquiao II? Should I post the countless articles where the MAJORITY of writers favored Marquez as the winner?

u dont want to play this game.

Well, I guess Chris John has it better than PAC, he actually has writers and international judges favoring him.

[2501]

Well, I guess Chris John has it better than PAC, he actually has writers and international judges favoring him.

Ah, because judges are always correct no matter what right? Please say yes.

[ferocity]

I remember Xcaret gave me a copy of the fight a few days after it aired and I uploaded that **** and over 20k people downloaded the fight. Even Rafael and a few other boxing writers mentioned in there article that they say it on the internet and i smiled knowing i uploaded that ****, lol.

There was a copy of the fight in the fight section, im sure you can still download the fight. I thought Marquez won. John reminded me of Manuel Medina, thats who he looked like to me in the way he fought he never stood still and keep boxing moving. He got too much credit for soft punchs or intended punchs.

[We want Floyd]

I remember Xcaret gave me a copy of the fight a few days after it aired and I uploaded that **** and over 20k people downloaded the fight. Even Rafael and a few other boxing writers mentioned in there article that they say it on the internet and i smiled knowing i uploaded that ****, lol.

There was a copy of the fight in the fight section, im sure you can still download the fight. I thought Marquez won. John reminded me of Manuel Medina, thats who he looked like to me in the way he fought he never stood still and keep boxing moving. He got too much credit for soft punchs or intended punchs.

Dude, if John got too much credit for those ineffective punches, how ya gonna give credit to De La Chicken's punches against Floyd? Or Soto's ineffective punches against Guzman

[We want Floyd]

Ah, because judges are always correct no matter what right? Please say yes.

And judges are always wrong when it involves a mexican fighter losing(lol)

[ferocity]

Dude, if John got too much credit for those ineffective punches, how ya gonna give credit to De La Chicken's punches against Floyd? Or Soto's ineffective punches against Guzman

I scored the fight for Marquez. I havn't seen the fight in a while, but it was clear that Marquez won. And that was before Marquez changed his style. I wouldn't mind to see Marquez v. John again after the Diaz fight. But as much as i'd like to see that fight, Im rooting for Rocky to beat John.

[2501]

And judges are always wrong when it involves a mexican fighter losing(lol)

when i have i ever said that?

[El Dominicano]

Yes I seen it and NO it wasn't a robbery. Could have gone either way but listen, ON THE REAL...The fight was very boring

[ferocity]

And judges are always wrong when it involves a mexican fighter losing(lol)

I hear they were wrong when Miguel "Holyfield" fought Valuev.

[We want Floyd]

I hear they were wrong when Miguel "Holyfield" fought Valuev.

That's the problem with hearsay.

Did you also hear about the judge who publicly admitted that he f**ked up the scoring of the first Juanita - PAC fight(lol)