Juan Manuel Marquez Wants To Force a Pacquiao Trilogy

[Kobayashi]

Where would Marquez be without Pacquiao seriously and dont be biased. He's had two close fights with Pac which credits him as a Top P4P fighter even though he lost. Other then that he fought Casamayor who was old anyways. Lets not forget the fight with Barrera which Marco dropped Marquez but never got credit for it. This was the same Barrera who's been in wars with Pac and Morales so really does Marquez get full credit for this win?

Why else is Marquez campaigning at 135, he was chasing Pac. Would Marquez be at 135 if Pac never went to 135, probably not.

Dont get me wrong now cause I know their are alot of Marquez fans here and I aint trying to discredit his skills cause YES he is a good boxer, but without Pacquiao where would he be? SERIOUSLY

Agree, Marquez is a very good fighter, but his fan are giving him too much credit because of 3 close fight with Barrera and Pacquaio. Marquez is lucky to walk away with a 1-1-1. It could have been 0-3. The first fight with Pac, Marquez clearly lost and he was very badly hurt at the end of the fight. Pac is the one who was robbed. The others two fight were close, Marquez wasn't pretty too, and he was lucky 1/2... no! 2/3 because Pac beat him clearly in the first fight.

His fan are still crying for him, but you know what, in boxing, don't expect to win every fight base on close rounds, and Marquez, who did he clearly beat? forget Casamayor, he lost to Santa Cruz and had a hard time again Katsadis.

Anyway, I still hope for a third fight with Pac, but after Meaweather and Margarito. At 140 again Pac, Marquez will get his beating of his life. Pac is a much better fighter and doesn't have weight problem like the the second fight.

[pistol whip]

spot on mate. marquez doesn't have the resume to begin with without pac in it ^_^. big deal he fought an old (very old) casamayor boo hoo

You could add Naseem Hamed being protected from Marquez by the WBO for years. Champion fighters wern't exactly excited to fight a guy who was technically flawless and posed a serious threat to everyone.

**** him and barrera both fought at the great western forum for years and even the promoters they shared at the time never let them fight. seriously it's like you saw marquez fight once and you think you know everything about him.

[JAS_JAS]

Pacquaio may have won one of the fights on three judges scorecards but everyone else knows that the last fight could have gone either way...There first fight was a draw after JMM was knocked down three times in the 1st round... Yeah, thats not intriging compared to fighting a overrated Hatton and a retired PBF... If floyd loses to Pacquaio, it'll be due to inactivity!! If Marquez and Morales gave Pacquiao fits with their boxing skills, what would a floyd mayweather do??? Pick pacquiao apart... The only intriging parts of what u perpose is how long before Hatton gets KO'd and whether PBF still has it

clearly this guy is an ignorant hater ignore him lolz ^_^

[trainhard_187]

Yes Pac does need Marquez because every good fighter like Pacman needs a foil to be great. Call it unfair or whatever but a lot of good fighters don't get the credit they deserve till they fight someone that can hit them back and make them take as much as they give.

Why do you think Boxing writers and Critic's laugh when mayweather says he's the greatest of all time and they clap and weep at old footage of Ali calling himself the greatest of all time?

It's because Ali fought everybody and beat everybody while Floyd makes Good Buissness decisions and cries when low risk and low reward fights do nothing for his reputation.

Without Marquez Pac never fights De La Hoya and he's stuck fighting b+ fighters the rest of his career.

Not all analyst give Pac credit for his win with Marquez anyways so if you take Pacs fights with Marquez out of the picture, Pac would still be P4P anyways.

I doubt that, Marquez had nothing to do with Pacs intentions to fight DLH. Pac saw an opportunity and took like any fighter would. A chance to dethrone the PPV king. No way Marquez had anything to do with that.

Look, honestly I aint saying Marquez aint good and in no way trying to discredit his skills, all im saying is take each fighter out of each others resume. Where would they both be?

[riveraboxing]

clearly this guy is making this up WTF!! are you that desperate of making pac look bad your making things up? hahaha how old are you? 12? hahaha

Dumbass... i wrote if I was mistaken because their are alot of rumors and such go on....

1)Fighters get blamed for what their teams say sometimes
2)Since I am on this site as well as two other site as well as read Ring and other boxing magazines I didn't know if others had been exposed to the same info or if that info had been discredited
3) That statement would support JMM, not discredit Pacquiao u dumb ****.. I am 12??? I can comprehend what i read

[JAS_JAS]

You could add Naseem Hamed being protected from Marquez by the WBO for years. Champion fighters wern't exactly excited to fight a guy who was technically flawless and posed a serious threat to everyone.

**** him and barrera both fought at the great western forum for years and even the promoters they shared at the time never let them fight. seriously it's like you saw marquez fight once and you think you know everything about him.

coulda shoulda woulda. your speaking speculation brotha ^_^. i wont put too much weight on it because it didnt happen ^_^

[boxing2106]

i think in a 3rd fight. pacquiao would really put a beating on him. but he has business with hatton at 140. i see its true what people say about jmm and crying like a baby. doesnt matter how close it was the ****ing jugdes said u lost so u lost ok? stop cryin about a fight with pac wen u can cement your own legacy without a problem at 135. that division will be a test for him. i would love to see him face campbell after he beats diaz. but i wouldnt be surprised if diaz outworks jmm.

[pistol whip]

"If your not mistaken" so that means sounds like a hearsay to me... Never heard and never been brought up here of that news bro....

Then facing Hatton would not also be dangerous for pacquiao knowing that Hatton is undefeated at 140lbs?

The diffrence is nobody is trying to discredit Pacman and all of you are trying to discredit Marquez even though he's the only guy to push Pacman to the limit like no other fighter has in years.

He's Number 2 in the world for a reason and considering that even junior middleweights are getting Knocked out by Pacman Manny is the only name that Marquez needs on his resume to be great.

[start11]

Yes Pac does need Marquez because every good fighter like Pacman needs a foil to be great. Call it unfair or whatever but a lot of good fighters don't get the credit they deserve till they fight someone that can hit them back and make them take as much as they give.

Why do you think Boxing writers and Critic's laugh when mayweather says he's the greatest of all time and they clap and weep at old footage of Ali calling himself the greatest of all time?

It's because Ali fought everybody and beat everybody while Floyd makes Good Buissness decisions and cries when low risk and low reward fights do nothing for his reputation.

Without Marquez Pac never fights De La Hoya and he's stuck fighting b+ fighters the rest of his career.

Well i think its not Marquez who gave pacquiao chance to fight ODLH but his impressive win over a shot David diaz(if thats what others call him).

[JAS_JAS]

Dumbass... i wrote if I was mistaken because their are alot of rumors and such go on....

1)Fighters get blamed for what their teams say sometimes
2)Since I am on this site as well as two other site as well as read Ring and other boxing magazines I didn't know if others had been exposed to the same info or if that info had been discredited
3) That statement would support JMM, not discredit Pacquiao u dumb ****.. I am 12??? I can comprehend what i read

yeah right ignorant haters usually spew rumors ^_^ lolz. **** them 12 yr old haters