mayweather will fight pacquiao because pacquiao is smaller than him
Collapse
-
-
If is the magic word. If he fights either, that's good and I think the criticism will be there but in a much lesser degree.Comment
-
Floyd will never call him a bum??? Floyd's made a career out of calling everyone a bum.
According to floyd....
Gatti = bum
Pacquiao = bum
Cotto = bum
Delahoya = bum
Marquez= bum
Hatton= bum (when his dad started training him he's great all of a sudden)Comment
-
Like i've said on many posts, Floyd will come back to fight Pacquiao and if Margarito is still the top dog in the WW division, Floyd will have to fight him. No doubt. The money will be too much. If he rejected $8million 2 years ago, imagine how much money will be offered this time... This is the fight the boxing public want. And it could well happen in 2010 if both fighters have a good 2009.
But lets to say for example Floyd beats Margarito, he should get full credit for his victory but sadly that won't be the case. This is why i don't understand some boxing fans. They'll critisize a fighter for not fighting a certain someone, but if they do and if they beat that certain someone, they'll make excuses.
For me, i have big hatred for Calzaghe. I think he's faced guys at that wrong time. But if he faces and beats Chad Dawson, my critisizm's will be heavily decreased. If im asking for a Dawson fight and he actually beats him, i have nothing to critisize him for.
But this will never be the case with certain Floyd haters, they'll continue discrediting his victories.Comment
-
Please give me qoutes... Thank You.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ive never heard him call Margarito a bum, nor will he. He knows Margaritos top dog at Welter at the moment.Comment
-
Comment
-
Mayweather "Cherry Picking" opponents instead of fighting Margarito.
People say Mayweather would sooner fight a smaller Pacquiao than Margarito... but you could also say that Margarito would sooner fight at Welterweight were he can walk through everyone's shots because he’s bigger than his opponents, instead of going up a one or two weight classes where he can actually have a fair challenge. I have got nothing against Margarito, I think he fought a fantastic fight against Cotto, but all I am stating is that it goes both ways.
Margarito picks on "the smaller guy", so you cannot say anything about Mayweather because he has taken a lot more risks than Margarito has, by going through 5 weight classes and winning 6 world titles, one of them being in Light Middleweight when he actually started off in Super Featherweight, while remaining undefeated which nobody in history has done before. People also have to bare in mind that he is 31 years old now, I know that isn't that old but he is getting on as well, you just need to give the guy the credit he deserves because he is an excellent talent with excellent skills.
If Mayweather fought and beat Pacquiao, people would blame it on weight and size difference, if Mayweather beat Margarito, they would make up some other excuse or give him another name to fight that "would knock him the f*** out", however if Margarito was to beat Mayweather there would be no discussion about size difference... because people don't like Mayweather and they want him to lose.
Anyway if the fight was to take place, I think Mayweather would beat both Pacquiao and Margarito, I think he would be too much for Pacquiao and win by either UD or late TKO. As for Margarito, I don't think Mayweather would be able to knock him out because of Margarito's very impressive chin, but I do think Mayweather's agility, defense, speed, and accuracy will be the key to Mayweather winning by decision. However as I have said this on many of my posts, this is just my opinion, and obviously there would be people who would disagree, so I just want to get it straight that I am not trying to belittle anybodies opinion.
Comment
-
AGAIN!!! IT'S CALLED THE odlh PHILOSOPHY...EVERYONE IS DOING IT...LOL... ONLY THAT EVERYONE (PAC&PBF) WINS AT IT... WHILE THE INVENTER OF THE PHILOSOPHY DOESN'T SEEM TO BE ABLE TO PULL THE TRIGGER....(even against safer smaller opponants while at the same time unable to win a single rd.)
Comment
Comment