Gridiron... first of all, relax. Seems you take this stuff a little too seriously.
And second... point out one word in the piece that was inaccurate.
Whether you consider the WBA belt to legitimate or not, a win over Valuev would have made Holyfield "a" world champion. Not "THE" world champion, because Wlad Klitschko surely holds that recognition by consensus. But Evander would have had a title and, by simple definition, been a "reigning" champion for the fifth time.
So... to answer your expletive-deleted question, that's what I was f***ing talkin' about.
And second... point out one word in the piece that was inaccurate.
Whether you consider the WBA belt to legitimate or not, a win over Valuev would have made Holyfield "a" world champion. Not "THE" world champion, because Wlad Klitschko surely holds that recognition by consensus. But Evander would have had a title and, by simple definition, been a "reigning" champion for the fifth time.
So... to answer your expletive-deleted question, that's what I was f***ing talkin' about.
Comment