Prime( and training too) Naz Hamed Vs Pac of 2008

[Ray*]

Too Tough to call, The Naz that was around before 2000 was a beast, He trained and listen to his trainer, He wasnt too in-love with his power.

I would lean towards Naz because he also had a great chin to go with his power and boxing ability.

[Motofan]

A fat Pac would embarass Naz and KO him in brutal fashion. A prime Pac would leave him dead in the ring.

[S A M U R A I]

''It was far from a princely performance, though he never stopped grinning, even when the crowd resorted to the football chant: "You're **** and you know you are.''

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/general/boxing-all-strut-and-no-substance-for-naseem-651677.html

100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[4773Y350NM3]

Pac was not a featherweight in 2008.

The Pac that beat Barrera and drew with JMM would have his hands full with the best version of Hamed. It would possibly be the most exciting fight of all time, with 704 knockdowns.

I mean by PAC of 2008 in terms of skills, After 2004 PAC greatly improves his skills. I like to think Pac is in his peak right now. With that said ,who you got between PAC of 2008 vs Prime NAz?

[S A M U R A I]

I don't even think you need Pac circa 2008. Pac circa 2003 would have done a fine job.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[Fearless BONG]

Forget Naz, coz he is a bum, and exposed by MAB,

Pacman will going to destroyed that bum even if they fight at Prime vs Prime....

Pacman vs Hitman on May 2, let the countdown begin.....

This will be a WAR...

[Clegg]

I mean by PAC of 2008 in terms of skills, After 2004 PAC greatly improves his skills. I like to think Pac is in his peak right now. With that said ,who you got between PAC of 2008 vs Prime NAz?

Pac is a much more complete boxer now. Would be very hard for Hamed to beat the Pac of 2008.

[Sugarj]

Very tough fight to call, I'll be unpopular and say I think the Hamed of 1995 would actually win that fight.

His skills were simply amazing around 1994/95, most non Brits probably wont have seen the Naz of before the Kevin Kelly fight in 1997 where the beginning of his decline were really first manifest.

Naz's skills did deteriorate quite quickly into the late 90s even though he was clearly in most people's pound for pound top ten at this time. That said....the guy who fought Barrera was far worse than the guy of six years before.

[badboypeenoy]

I mean by PAC of 2008 in terms of skills, After 2004 PAC greatly improves his skills. I like to think Pac is in his peak right now. With that said ,who you got between PAC of 2008 vs Prime NAz?

I like Naz but he'd lose the way Morales lost to Pacquiao in their second fight. Hamed would do good in the first few rounds, then the accumulation on puches would start to take its toll, slow Hamed down and be brutalized by Pacman in the later rounds. He can't outspeed Pacquiao. If Barrera can land punches on Hamed, I'm sure Pacman also can, and those punches will be felt by Hamed.

[Mr Man]

Naseem Hamed's awkwardness may prove to be challenging, but I'd go with a Pacman UD.