Why Didn't Calzaghe Ever Fight Sven Ottke?

[daggum]

FLOL! Boxing Scene is largely made up of USA members.

Make a poll on it.

no they aren't. i just did an ip trace of every member and 54 percent are from the uk. what now? CALZAGHE POWER!

[S A M U R A I]

no they aren't. i just did an ip trace of every member and 54 percent are from the uk. what now? CALZAGHE POWER!

Oh, so you're an admin now?



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[hammerhiem]

no they aren't. i just did an ip trace of every member and 54 percent are from the uk. what now? CALZAGHE POWER!

Sure you did Daggum, just like the majority of people thought Hopkins won...

Some village has clearly lost it's idiot.

[sparked_85]

Ottke is actually better than even I give him credit for.

He was a good fighter.

It's just him struggling with David Starie that put me off. David Starie could feasibly have won. David Starie was the most amateurish professional I have ever seen and made zero adjustments for the pro game and it's not like he was a brilliant, world-beating amateur either.

On that point James DeGale=David Starie

[daggum]

Sure you did Daggum, just like the majority of people thought Hopkins won...

Some village has clearly lost it's idiot.

ok explain why every writer ringside had hopkins winning? biased americans i guess. bad angle? drunk? calzaghe haters that don't appreciate his inaccurate slaps? which one lil boy?

[sparked_85]

ok explain why every writer ringside had hopkins winning? biased americans i guess. bad angle? drunk? calzaghe haters that don't appreciate his inaccurate slaps? which one lil boy?

Hopkins would man-**** you in heartbeat for such stoic defence of his performance.

[hammerhiem]

ok explain why every writer ringside had hopkins winning? biased americans i guess. bad angle? drunk? calzaghe haters that don't appreciate his inaccurate slaps? which one lil boy?

You mean like the writer for ABC? the American news station?

http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/0408/513473.html

Calzaghe (45-0) rebounded from a first-round knockdown at the hands of "The Executioner" to seemingly win easy, however one judge did give the 43-year-old Hopkins the fight by a score of 114-113. The other two judges scored in favor of the 36-year-old from Newbridge, though, 116-111 and 115-112.

Hey I guess the American media must hate Hopkins or something.

Or maybe the Boxer from this site was biased too...

http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=13611

This scribe Ultimtely came up with a score of 116-111 to the victor

More unbiased Not Uk opinion

http://www.boxingwatchers.com/2008/04/round-by-round-joe-calzaghe-vs-bernard.html

[daggum]

You mean like the writer for ABC? the American news station?

http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/0408/513473.html

Hey I guess the American media must hate Hopkins or something.

this is merely a report stating the outcome of the fight not a writer who scored the bout. you do realize abc doesn't personally send a writer to the fights you idiot. they just get news reports from the ap and make their own articles. SELF OWNAGE.

[fightnews55]

Because Otteke wasn't over 45 yet.

[daggum]

Hopkins would man-**** you in heartbeat for such stoic defence of his performance.

omg my dream!