I'd vote for pac, only reason why marg would not get my vote is because he fought cotto in the same weight class where as pac moved up in weight and still delivered a exciting win.
I'd vote for pac, only reason why marg would not get my vote is because he fought cotto in the same weight class where as pac moved up in weight and still delivered a exciting win.
wow....I think Cotto would've KILLED Oscar at 147.....so that makes Marg's victory more significant than Pac's.
DLH was passed it, but Pac moving up weight and winning by TKO says alot
Hopkins beating Pavlik was certainly something special.
Marg was underdog, that too is worth a mention.
but the fact Calzaghe is even mentioned is the reason of everything wrong with boxing today. The guy survived and won a dodgy SD against a 43 year old, and beat up a washed up RJJ, who was 3-3 in his last 6 fights and going to retire.
Pacman should win this, Dawson beat two more legit fighters in the division than Calzaghe so I don't think Joe even deserves to be mentioned. I thought Hopkins' win over Pavlik was pretty damn impressive as well
there is no race,... Pacman goes up in weight class and beats champions after champions,.. Calzaghe fights old timers who are well past their prime and won't even fight a rematch to clear the air against Kessler or Bhop,.. Pacman fights them all and sometimes several times apiece.
I can understand a Hopkins rematch, it was a SD... but Kessler? Calzaghe won 8 or 9 rounds dude, he got a wide UD. Why should he have to rematch Kessler? That's absurd.
Comment