Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Joe being in the same sentence as Mayweather is a joke

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Thread is a joke Mayweather lost to Castillo and beat Corrales are they any better than wins over Kessler and Hopkins?

    Also this Hopkins is past it is crap the man is on his best career run and Calzaghe beat him in the middle of it. He beat Tarver (Before) Pavlik (After) and never lost a round.

    Dynamite Kiddly Fiddler, that fits.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
      Joe being in the same sentence as Mayweather is a joke
      Mayweather being mentioned in the same sentence as Ali and Robinson is a joke, but it doesn't stop him or many of his fans doing it.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by JC#1 View Post

        Gift decision?

        Most (real) Calzaghe nuthuggers scored the bout clearly for Calzaghe.
        fixed.....

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Testdead View Post
          Thread is a joke Mayweather lost to Castillo and beat Corrales are they any better than wins over Kessler and Hopkins?

          Also this Hopkins is past it is crap the man is on his best career run and Calzaghe beat him in the middle of it. He beat Tarver (Before) Pavlik (After) and never lost a round.

          Dynamite Kiddly Fiddler, that fits.


          If Castillo beat Mayweather then Hopkins beat Calzaghe only Castillo was not an old man

          Hopkins is past his best regardless who he beat perfect Calzaghe oponent i guess


          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
            If Castillo beat Mayweather then Hopkins beat Calzaghe only Castillo was not an old man

            Hopkins is past his best regardless who he beat perfect Calzaghe oponent i guess




            LOL thats very funny.

            Firstly wins over Castillo and Corrales are not as good as Kessler and Hopkins its that simple.

            Secondly what planet are you on? WTF are you telling me you scored cal/Hops for Hops?

            Your arguments are poor.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Testdead View Post
              LOL thats very funny.

              Firstly wins over Castillo and Corrales are not as good as Kessler and Hopkins its that simple.

              Secondly what planet are you on? WTF are you telling me you scored cal/Hops for Hops?

              Your arguments are poor.
              Yeah because Hopkins was in his prime and Kessler has beaten ..........who?

              Im saying i did not think either of them won it you have to land punches to win a fight and while Calzaghe was forcing the action he was not landing **** and he was made to look garbage in the fight. The fight should of been called a draw Calzaghe hit thin air all night and Hopkins decked him then held all night when he got tired.


              You 1st argument is absolutely hilarious

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
                Yeah because Hopkins was in his prime and Kessler has beaten ..........who?

                Im saying i did not think either of them won it you have to land punches to win a fight and while Calzaghe was forcing the action he was not landing **** and he was made to look garbage in the fight. The fight should of been called a draw Calzaghe hit thin air all night and Hopkins decked him then held or night when he got tired.


                You 1st argument is absolutely hilarious
                Dude. You're just a troll, man. A spammer who gets kicks winding people up.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by medium-deek View Post
                  Dude. You're just a troll, man. A spammer who gets kicks winding people up.
                  And you son have NO arguement i suggest you move on.

                  What im saying is the truth thats why im attracting so many insecure Calzaghe fan boys.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Yea the "Hopkins is 43" bit is ridiculous. They just look at the number and say, "Oh he's 43, he must be totally washed up and done for" If you look at his recent fights, you can see Hopkins is anything but washed up, he's not in his prime, but he's still VERY dangerous. I haven't seen anything significant in his latest fights to tell me otherwise. His stamina was amazing against Pavlik, he kept the same fast pace for the whole fight. Had great handspeed, combinations etc etc.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Kastrioti View Post
                      Yea the "Hopkins is 43" bit is ridiculous. They just look at the number and say, "Oh he's 43, he must be totally washed up and done for" If you look at his recent fights, you can see Hopkins is anything but washed up, he's not in his prime, but he's still VERY dangerous. I haven't seen anything significant in his latest fights to tell me otherwise. His stamina was amazing against Pavlik, he kept the same fast pace for the whole fight. Had great handspeed, combinations etc etc.
                      It dont matter how far gone he is, he is out of his prime just like all Joe's opponents the only ones that are'nt are overrated prospects who have fought or beaten nobody.

                      His stamina was not amazing against Pavlik the story of the fight was that Pavlik was tailor made for Hopkins stylewise, but we all thought he did'nt have the stamina to pull it off , but the weight effected Pavlik and slowed him down enough for Hopkins to control and fight at his own pace.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP