Would a third belt make Wladimir undisputed heavyweight champ

[warp1432]

If Wlad defeats Chagaev/Valuev he not only gets the WBA belt, but he also obtains the Ring Belt.

Is that enough for him to be the undisputed champ, or does he still need the WBC strap.

He wouldn't get the ring belt. I just noticed this part. This isn't a case of 1 vs 3.

[Dan...]

A fighter can't be considered undisputed as long as there's another fighter out there holding a major title.

My god. You changed your sig and av.

[larryx]

ok ok..lets stop..wlad is the heavy weight champ..only A fool would argue or dispute..if you gotta look to the rules to find an excuse..then you know the answer//wlad has the most belts.the best resume..and the most defenses..the heavyweight champ//vitali and valuev(lol)are just belt holders

[Enayze]

He wouldn't get the ring belt. I just noticed this part. This isn't a case of 1 vs 3.

No? Howcome, I thought it was either 1 vs 2 or 1 vs 3, explain?

[warp1432]

No? Howcome, I thought it was either 1 vs 2 or 1 vs 3, explain?

It wouldn't be 1 vs 3 because Vitali is clearly the number 2 fighter and he shouldn't be by passed. Though, I could be wrong and they would recognize it because they would know Vitali and Wlad would never unify, but I don't they would do that.

I think a 1 vs 3 case would be like if the #2 and #3 contender are interchangeable.

[Silencers]

Perhaps not "undisputed" but he can be "universally recognized".

He pretty much is already universally recognized as the heavyweight champion of the world. Undisputed will have to wait though.

My god. You changed your sig and av.

Yeah, I was getting bored of the old ones.