Now that the title has got your attention I wanted to bring up an interresting subject. Since everyone sees this era of heavyweight boxing as such a lackluster bunch of pugs, I was wanting to post a poll to see who all agreed or do not agree that George Foreman would have never been able to beat a current title belt holder in this era, while he was able to have success against a supposedly stronger group of talent in the late 80's to the mid-90's. I think Big George would get sparked out by the likes of either Klitschko and beaten soundly by Valuev, Chagaev or even David Haye. Let me know your thoughts on the matter because I think that this heavyweight era has more talent than it is given credit for and that Tyson, Holyfield's and Lewis' title reigns were a little over hyped.
Note* This poll is referring to Foreman's chances if he returned now instead of 1987 at the age he was then, not if he had returned now @ his current age.
Note* This poll is referring to Foreman's chances if he returned now instead of 1987 at the age he was then, not if he had returned now @ his current age.
Comment