Who will be the next Great Black Hope after Haye?

[Flawless.]

I don't want to be cast in the wrong light so all I am saying is read up on who owns what who has control, who owns majority shares 7 who has the biggest publications and influence THEN make YOUR OWN judgement ok.

To just assume the media is under 'white control' is in itself a prejudiced view though.

Just to make it clear *** fall under the white race category


Anyways I would love to see the link who exactly owns the media.

[werewolf]

Just to make it clear *** fall under the white race category


Anyways I would love to see the link who exactly owns the media.

Talmudic ***s are not a race, they are a cult. There are black ***s, White ***s, Asian ***s, etc.

Just do a search for "who controls the media", "who owns the media", etc. After that see if you can figure out who controls the politicians and the financial system, like the Federal Reserve Bank scam, too, while you're at it.

[realheavyhands]

i should say great black dope, like they referred to white fighters in the media when blacks had the heavyweight belts. So, have you picked one out yet, kids? Doesn't hurt to start planning in advance.

its probably your f u c k i n mama

[Rosseboi]

Just to make it clear *** fall under the white race category

Anyways I would love to see the link who exactly owns the media.

Actually I never said ***s & I don't see why I should have to trawl through the web to prove white people don't control the media. So its wrong for me to defend the assumptions white people control & influence through the media but its ok to assume whites do?

And for the record ***ish people are descendants of Hebrews but have lived & bred amongst Europeans for so many years visually there's almost no difference. I never once singled out the ***ish faith - you brought it up - I simply asked people to reference the figures to debunk the stereotype of white control.

Here's an example from the AFDL's website. That's the Anti Defamation league. A league setup to debunk racial prejudices and stereotypes on behalf of the ***ish faith:

Boosters and antisemites agree: ***s have been prominent and predominant in all phases of the [motion picture] business: production, distribution and exhibition." He noted that, at the time, "Of the 100 most powerful people in the industry according to a recent survey by Premiere, most, including the top 12, are ***ish," but observed, "Though individual ***s control Hollywood, ***ishness does not." In fact, Hollywood studios are publicly owned corporations and motion pictures are made by the efforts of individual men and women, some of whom are ***ish, many of whom are not.

http://www.adl.org/special_reports/movie_industry.asp

Once again: Maths doesn't lie! The ***ish faith accounts for 3% of America's population which would equate all things being equal to a 3/100 ratio of ***ish faith to non ***ish faith in the media but is is anything but that - and this is from the ADL itself; nobody else.

I don't care what issues people do or do not have with regards to the ***ish faith I couldn't give a monkeys who controls what but when people proclaim 'white control of the media!' when the plain, simple maths is anything but that it pisses me off.

[werewolf]

"The ***ish faith accounts for 3% of America's population..."


More like 2% actually.

[paul750]

I don't believe there's any actual hate for the Klitschkos', I just think it's the fact they fight boring fights and have quite dull personalities. The good black fighters tend to be more aesthetically pleasing on the eye. They have a fluidness about them, whereas these big white fellows seem to be very stiff and lack continuity. They seem to just stand and throw straight punches. It's hardly much of a variety. Boxing [and other sports] is not just about winning, it's about looking good doing so. People like to see lots of different punches, combos, body movement, personality etc.

The Eastern Euros are doing well now, and the Klitschkos' would be formidable opponents for fighters of any era, particularly Vitali. But the current state of the division is as much to do with the lack of depth as it is to do with the Eastern Euros being good. Look at that Virchis guy, he was supposed to have given Chagaev a tough fight, but looked rather ordinary aganist Gomez.

[The Hammer]

I don't believe there's any actual hate for the Klitschkos', I just think it's the fact they fight boring fights and have quite dull personalities. The good black fighters tend to be more aesthetically pleasing on the eye. They have a fluidness about them, whereas these big white fellows seem to be very stiff and lack continuity. They seem to just stand and throw straight punches. It's hardly much of a variety. Boxing [and other sports] is not just about winning, it's about looking good doing so. People like to see lots of different punches, combos, body movement, personality etc.

Most heterosexual men don't watch boxing to see graceful, aesthetically pleasing men - we just want to see a good fight, hopefully ending in a brutal KO. If someone wants to see graceful men who look good, they can always watch ballet. :gay:

I prefer to watch the Klitschkos fight because of all the KOs.

The Eastern Euros are doing well now, and the Klitschkos' would be formidible opponents for fighters of any era, particularly Vitali. But the current state of the division is as much to do with the lack of depth as it is to do with the Eastern Euros being good. Look at that Virchis guy, he was supposed to have given Chagaev a tough fight, but looked rather ordinary aganist Gomez.

Virchis had health issues and serious differences with his promoter. He lost a lot of weight, mostly muscle in the months leading up to that fight. He was not at his best and not focused, that's why I made a bet against him and won. Normally, I would have bet on him to defeat Gomez, though.

[paul750]

Most heterosexual men don't watch boxing to see graceful, aesthetically pleasing men - we just want to see a good fight, hopefully ending in a brutal KO. If someone wants to see graceful men who look good, they can always watch ballet. :gay:

.

Watching robotic fighters isn't pleasing on my eyes and a lot of other people's eyes. How can it be good to see one guy throw the same punches round after round? Obviously their opponents meatheadish attitude is helping the Klitschkos' make it a very good tactic, but it is not pleasing whatsoever.

[The Hammer]

Watching robotic fighters isn't pleasing on my eyes and a lot of other people's eyes. How can it be good to see one guy throw the same punches round after round? Obviously their opponents meatheadish attitude is helping the Klitschkos' make it a very good tactic, but it is not pleasing whatsoever.

White fighters aren't "robotic", you seem very prejudiced in your views.

I love watching the Klitschkos fight, especially Vitali.

[paul750]

White fighters aren't "robotic", that's racist! You seem very prejudiced in your views.

I love watching the Klitschkos fight, especially Vitali.

Incorrect! If I were to say I didn't find Asian women attractive, I would merely be stating that I didn't find them physically attractive and no more. In the same way I may find another race of woman unattractive. It has no bearing on how I'd view them in any other way, and my impartiality in any other aspect. So you're saying someone would be racist by those terms?

I said the Klitschkos' are not pleasing to me because of the manner in which they fight. I have not said they are not effective at what they do. How that could possibly be racist I do not know.