really Joe, why not? say what you want, but Dawson is highly regarded right now, especially after all the success that Adamek has had lately. instead of all the boohooing about the state of boxing, why not face the best opponent out there for you?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Shaun George: "Calzaghe, Why Not Fight Chad Dawson?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by F•R•K•O View PostExactly. If anyone deserves a fight with Calzaghe, it's Glen.
Chad Dawson is a ****ing opportunist. He wants 3 old guys in a row.
So who's the fraud here?
Comment
-
Originally posted by blackirish137 View Postreally Joe, why not? say what you want, but Dawson is highly regarded right now, especially after all the success that Adamek has had lately. instead of all the boohooing about the state of boxing, why not face the best opponent out there for you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by CastorTroy View PostChad Dawson isn't the best light heavy, that should go to Glen Johnson. For a fight that almost everyone felt he lost except Chad Dawsons fans, he really didn't feel like shutting anyone up by giving Johnson the rematch. If judges knew how to score fights and we didn't have so many judges who judge fights like Julie Lederman in this sport, Dawson wouldn't even be undefeated.
Punching someone in the gloves does not count as landed punches, is it honestly that hard to be a judge?
SO if punching gloves doesn't count, then Calzaghe shouldn't be mentioned in top ten pound for pound. That all he did to Bernard in their fight.
Calzaghe nutthuggers die, because he is a fraud.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Allucard View PostCalzaghe has been fighting very young guys. Biologically Calzaghe has the body of a 20 year old THAT IS PROVEN !!FACT!! and /sarcasm I really think he should fight Dawson. Glen is old. Why the **** you want Calzaghe to fight but only if it's an announced victory? Every great fighter fought vs younger opposition. It's Calzaghe's own fault he didn't take the big names in their primes. Now he's either gonna get ass whooped by Dawson or stay retired like the cowards he AND YOU, HIS FANS, are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Clegg View PostI think Shaun George makes a valid point.
You can't complain that boxing is dying when you've just had a fight that many feel was bad for the sport, and you are probably going to turn down a fight that many feel is good for the sport.
And I don't see any problem with Calzaghe-Hopkins, Dawson-Johnson or Dawson-Tarver. Nothing wrong with beating a 40 year old guy if he's one of the best in the division. It's only a problem when the 40 year old guy in question is without a notable win in several years that I'd criticise the matchup(ie. Roy Jones).
Roy Jones' last notable win was Antonio Tarver 4 years ago.
Comment
-
-
-
Comment