I love Pacman, but we need to see him vs a prime, slick fighter

[MaYaN_SuN]

yeah, if I was roach I wouldn't put pac in w/ slick boxers... although defensive fighters who backpedal all the time and play defense all the time might not fair so well w/ pac's activity.

Paq won't just lose 'to a fighter who moves.' Anyone that can put a real fresh punch in his face will put a huge detour through his entire offense. I mean Marquez has average defense when he trades with Paq, and he also has the hands to land his own in an exchange, he has the hands to throw lead hooks to the body against Manny(though it costed him 1 knock down in the second fight, didn't stop him from throwin that punch, he even hurt Manny with that punch), he has the hands to lead with the right, and he has the hands to counter. Oscar should have been next, but the weight loss took his entire body away from him.

Now I'm not sayin Manny would for surely lose to a fighter who can actually fight back, lol but him goin against a fighter who can fight back would definitely paint a different picture of Paq than what we see now.

[Pullcounter]

Paq won't just lose 'to a fighter who moves.' Anyone that can put a real fresh punch in his face will put a huge detour through his entire offense. I mean Marquez has average defense when he trades with Paq, and he also has the hands to land his own in an exchange, he has the hands to throw lead hooks to the body against Manny(though it costed him 1 knock down in the second fight, didn't stop him from throwin that punch, he even hurt Manny with that punch), he has the hands to lead with the right, and he has the hands to counter. Oscar should have been next, but the weight loss took his entire body away from him.

Now I'm not sayin Manny would for surely lose to a fighter who can actually fight back, lol but him goin against a fighter who can fight back would definitely paint a different picture of Paq than what we see now.

you're right about one thing, if you can back pac up you can beat him... morales proved that in morales/pac I.