Who have you got at #2 p4p?

[ACHlLLES]

JMM lost twice to pacquiao, don't care the mexicans say he was robbed. He wasn't robbed, he lost a close fight twice. How does losing to pacquiao twice warrent a p4p 2 spot?

[RichCCFC]

dint mean to insult your boyfriend ricky

Isn't Floyd yours?

[Dice]

Calzaghe deserves it more in my opinion. Marquez in his career has lost fights he should have won. Shot or not, Calzaghe has beaten everyone in front of hin, made over 20 defenses, moved up, and beat Hopkins (who aint finished) and Roy (who is)

All props to Juan for beating Joel Casamayor, but career wise, he's lost to Freddie Norwood and Chris John, and technically the first Pac fight since the judge made a mistake in his adding

A great fighter but Joe should be number two

[larryx]

so marquez then i take it larry.

damn right he arguably beat pacman twice..a draw and a split decision with the p4p champ..yea that makes his p4p # 2..then pacman destroyed diaz at 135..jmm did him 1 better and desroyed the lineal champ at 135

[larryx]

isn't floyd yours?

no i dont even bring floyd up..but joes nutts stay in your mouth

[2501]

Calzaghe deserves it more in my opinion. Marquez in his career has lost fights he should have won. Shot or not, Calzaghe has beaten everyone in front of hin, made over 20 defenses, moved up, and beat Hopkins (who aint finished) and Roy (who is)

All props to Juan for beating Joel Casamayor, but career wise, he's lost to Freddie Norwood and Chris John, and technically the first Pac fight since the judge made a mistake in his adding

A great fighter but Joe should be number two

Maybe that is because Marquez has taken more risk in his career. I like Joe. He IS a great fighter, he is at # 3 for a reason.

[egreezy]

JMM lost twice to pacquiao, don't care the mexicans say he was robbed. He wasn't robbed, he lost a close fight twice. How does losing to pacquiao twice warrent a p4p 2 spot?

First fight was draw, second was split decision loss by 1 point. I had him winning both fights. And the fact he was right there with Pac tooth and nail puts him right by him. A boring fight where you miss most of your punches does not top that.

[Nu Jerzey Devil]

Calzaghe hasn't done anything to say he should even be near the top ten pound for pound. His entire resume is a joke.

[Ryn0]

I have Joe over Marquez, Marquez looked good against Casamayor (but Casa should have lost to Santa Cruz) and Juarez.
He lost a razor thin decision to Pacquiao and won a razor thin decision over Barrera and beat someone called jaca?

No doubt he's a great fighter but I don't elevate him because of this win, I had Joe over Marquez before De La Hoya and I'll keep it that way unless Joe loses to someone/retires or Marquez unifies 135 (or beats Pac).

Calzaghe in his last few fights dominated a past it Jones, sc****d past Hopkins, Dominated Kessler, beat Bika (title contender at 168) and dominated undefeated Lacy (arguable made him shot Lacy was shown to be overhyped)

[Dice]

Maybe that is because Marquez has taken more risk in his career. I like Joe. He IS a great fighter, he is at # 3 for a reason.

How is losing to Freddie Norwood a risk? How is fighting Chris John over a second Pac fight a risk?

I give him credit for the Pac fights and the Casamayor fight but Joe has accomplished more in my opinion