Who defends Marg's decision to fight Mosley instead of Williams?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ANDROID_DOES
    What Apple CANT!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 10265
    • 459
    • 205
    • 17,529

    #51
    Originally posted by Pullcounter
    yeah, but marg lost to williams
    so williams and his fans need to nut hug that win like it justifies him as the top ww? That fight didn't even prove williams was better than margarito! It just showed if margarito would have started earlier williams losses. What else has he done to carry such claims ?? When margarito beats the #1 guy cotto he can't claim number one, but yet you want to claim williams #1 with his win over margarito and margarito wasn't ranked #1 at the time.

    Comment

    • deevel79
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 6831
      • 213
      • 27
      • 13,404

      #52
      Originally posted by a la verga
      Williams: quintana, margarito
      Cotto: Judah, Mosley
      margarito: Lujan, Cintron, clottey, cintron, cotto

      Which wins are more deserving of #1 spot?

      What other ww has fought more top 10 ww's than margarito?

      what other ww has beaten more top 10 ww than margarito?

      after the mosley fight margarito would have fought all top 5 ring magazing ranked ww's, well actually all 4 since he can't fight himself. Who who else has done that?


      so tell me who is more deserving than margarito of #1 spot?
      Well given that Margarito lost to Williams, i would have to put Williams ahead of Margarito. How can u have Margarito ahead of Williams, when Marg lost to Williams??? Can u please explain that logic to me?

      By your logic, Cotto is ahead of Margarito in the WW standings, even though he lost to Marg. Does that make much sense?

      Comment

      • MANGLER
        Sex Tape Flop Artist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 30142
        • 1,705
        • 2,355
        • 46,598

        #53
        Originally posted by a la verga
        so williams and his fans need to nut hug that win like it justifies him as the top ww? That fight didn't even prove williams was better than margarito! It just showed if margarito would have started earlier williams losses. What else has he done to carry such claims ?? When margarito beats the #1 guy cotto he can't claim number one, but yet you want to claim williams #1 with his win over margarito and margarito wasn't ranked #1 at the time.

        I've pointed this out in many a post homey. Real talk. Pwill deserves a rematch. He don't deserve to be called #1 at WW til he gets it and wins again.

        Comment

        • deevel79
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2005
          • 6831
          • 213
          • 27
          • 13,404

          #54
          Originally posted by Pancho Gonzales
          It will most likely be for more money down the line.
          Hey, that's a line from Mayweather's book! lol.

          Comment

          • Vasyl’s dad
            He said no rematch
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 23510
            • 1,120
            • 1,945
            • 50,072

            #55
            Originally posted by deevel79
            Well given that Margarito lost to Williams, i would have to put Williams ahead of Margarito. How can u have Margarito ahead of Williams, when Marg lost to Williams??? Can u please explain that logic to me?

            By your logic, Cotto is ahead of Margarito in the WW standings, even though he lost to Marg. Does that make much sense?

            No it doesn't because the fact remains, out of the 3, Paul, Migs, and Tony,



            Margarito is the only one with these names on his resume.

            Williams, Cotto, Clottey, Cintron, and soon to be Shane.

            Miguel only has Tony and Shane.

            Paul only has Tony.

            Comment

            • Vasyl’s dad
              He said no rematch
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2008
              • 23510
              • 1,120
              • 1,945
              • 50,072

              #56
              Originally posted by deevel79
              Hey, that's a line from Mayweather's book! lol.
              Yes, but Mayweather never fought the guys who challenged him,

              Antonio did.

              See the difference?

              Comment

              • -Boxzilla-
                undisputed
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 7975
                • 1,230
                • 1,610
                • 14,970

                #57
                i dont mind as long as he faces him in the future.

                Comment

                • deevel79
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 6831
                  • 213
                  • 27
                  • 13,404

                  #58
                  Originally posted by mangler
                  I've pointed this out in many a post homey. Real talk. Pwill deserves a rematch. He don't deserve to be called #1 at WW til he gets it and wins again.
                  So Williams has to beat Margarito 2x in order to be called the #1 WW? LOL....Do u just make up your own rules?

                  So from now on, a challenger has to defeat the champ TWICE in order for the win to be legit! LMAO!

                  Comment

                  • Pullcounter
                    no guts no glory
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 42582
                    • 549
                    • 191
                    • 49,739

                    #59
                    Originally posted by a la verga
                    so williams and his fans need to nut hug that win like it justifies him as the top ww? That fight didn't even prove williams was better than margarito! It just showed if margarito would have started earlier williams losses. What else has he done to carry such claims ?? When margarito beats the #1 guy cotto he can't claim number one, but yet you want to claim williams #1 with his win over margarito and margarito wasn't ranked #1 at the time.
                    nah, it proves that pwill is better than marg.

                    neither marg nor pwill can claim to be the #1 welterweight until they fight again.

                    Comment

                    • ANDROID_DOES
                      What Apple CANT!
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 10265
                      • 459
                      • 205
                      • 17,529

                      #60
                      Originally posted by deevel79
                      Well given that Margarito lost to Williams, i would have to put Williams ahead of Margarito. How can u have Margarito ahead of Williams, when Marg lost to Williams??? Can u please explain that logic to me?

                      By your logic, Cotto is ahead of Margarito in the WW standings, even though he lost to Marg. Does that make much sense?
                      you contradict your self so much! your theory fails!!!! is that the chicago bulls triangle theory you're using there?

                      and williams lost to quintana, who got ko'd by cotto, who got ko'd by margarito. do you get how ****** that is?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP