Who the F,uck made Hakkar...B-Hop's mandatory!

[Dynamite Kid]

No I asked why people were talking about Calzaghes resume in a thread which asks why Hopkins fought Hakkar.

Tool.

point is you just owned yourself

[Pullcounter]

Facts arent true?

OK then.

nah, made up facts aren't true

[Dynamite Kid]

No I asked why people were talking about Calzaghes resume in a thread which asks why Hopkins fought Hakkar.

Tool.

infact proof of ownership was that you lied about what you original said so you did not look such a fool here is what you actually said the unedited version


Why are people talking about Calzaghe on a Hopkins thread?


nothing about why are people talking about Joe's resume in a Hopkins thread

[Dirk Diggler UK]

point is you just owned yourself

Yes I "owned myself" by asking why people were comparing Calzaghes resume to Hopkins in a thread about Hopkins vs Hakkar.

[Dynamite Kid]

Yes I "owned myself" by asking why people were comparing Calzaghes resume to Hopkins in a thread about Hopkins vs Hakkar.

but you did not say that you liar

face it you just owned yourself and tried to re-own yourself and owned yourself AGAIN

[Dirk Diggler UK]

infact proof of ownership was that you lied about what you original said so you did not look such a fool here is what you actually said the unedited version


Why are people talking about Calzaghe on a Hopkins thread?


nothing about why are people talking about Joe's resume in a Hopkins thread

Why are people talking about Calzaghe on a Hopkins thread?

The only reason Joe should be mentioned here is because Hopkins ducked him to fight Hakkar

Thats what I originally said dip****.

Whos "lying" again?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

nah, made up facts aren't true

Do facts which you ignore immeditely become "made up"?

[Dynamite Kid]

Thats what I originally said dip****.

Whos "lying" again?

im talking about when you orginally owned yourself

TOOOOOOOL

[Pullcounter]

Do facts which you ignore immeditely become "made up"?

nah, whether or not i ignore them doesn't matter... they are still made up.

[Dynamite Kid]

the Nuthugging Idiot

blame Hopkins. This Was The Fight He Took After Ducking Calzaghe.

[the Beat Down]

hopkins Fought Way More Better Opponents Then Calzaghe.
Calzaghe Doesn't Have A Resume Like Hopkins. Hopkins Fought.

Trinidad *in His Prime*
De La Hoya *in His Prime*
Roy Jones Jr. *in His Prime, Not 100 Yrs After*
Glen Johnson *in His Prime When He Was Undefeated*
Winky Wright *broke His Record Because He Didn't Lose For Lilke 8 Yrs.*
Antonio Tarver *whooped Him After He Whooped Roy*
Jermaine Taylor * Even Tho He Lost, Both Fights Were Close
William Joppy *legit Middle Weight Champion At The Time*
Keith Holmes * Who Was The Wbc Champion At The Time*


Now Calzaghe Doesn't Have A Resume Half As Good As That. Plus Hopkins Has Fights With At Least 5 Promising Stars That Everybody Thought Would Be The Real Deal. But Hopkins Destroyed Them And You Never Heard From Them Again, Because Hopkins Whooped Them.

The Climb Down And Acknowledgment Of Ownership

why Are People Talking About Calzaghe On A Hopkins Thread?

The Only Reason Joe Should Be Mentioned Here Is Because Hopkins Ducked Him To Fight Hakkar

The Epic Failure Trying To Lie Instead Of Admitting He Got Owned

no I Asked Why People Weretalking About Calzaghes Resume In A Thread Which Asks Why Hopkins Fought Hakkar.

Tool.