Who the F,uck made Hakkar...B-Hop's mandatory!
Collapse
-
-
The thread asks why Hopkins fought Hakkar.
I says its because he ducked Calzaghe to fight him.
Someone starts listing Hopkins resume to compare it to Calzaghes. How does that change the fact he ducked him again?
I ask why people are talking about Calzaghe UNLESS its to state how Hopkins ducked.
Some tard says I owned myself.Comment
-
Comment
-
okay that was original post what difference does it make you still owned yourself and LIED to get yourself out of it cause you never said" i asked Why People Were talking About Calzaghes Resume:
you are to damn ****** to know when you have made a fool of yourself
Comment
-
changed you mind again ehThe thread asks why Hopkins fought Hakkar.
I says its because he ducked Calzaghe to fight him.
Someone starts listing Hopkins resume to compare it to Calzaghes. How does that change the fact he ducked him again?
I ask why people are talking about Calzaghe UNLESS its to state how Hopkins ducked.
Some tard says I owned myself.
Comment
-
Yes I asked why people were talking about Calzaghe unless it was to say Hopkins ducked him.
People were talking about his resume. Which has nothing to do with this thread.
*Prays ****** finally understand*Comment
-
No.The thread asks why Hopkins fought Hakkar.
I says its because he ducked Calzaghe to fight him.
Someone starts listing Hopkins resume to compare it to Calzaghes. How does that change the fact he ducked him again?
I ask why people are talking about Calzaghe UNLESS its to state how Hopkins ducked.
Some tard says I owned myself.
Comment
-
YOU brought up Calzaghe period
so you did not say why are people talking about Calzaghe's resume? NO
cheers
Comment
-
I asked why people were talking about Calzaghe unless it was to state how Hopkins ducked him.
People were talking about his resume instead.
This does not fall under the category of Hopkins ducking him.
So what was your argument again?Comment
-
Comment
Comment