It's Official: Miguel Cotto Is A Bum.

[ELHURACAN58]

Im confused.

Is he defending or attacking Cotto?

[NAPO]

Im confused.

Is he defending or attacking Cotto?

its sarcasm.you'll get used to it.
this site its ****ing insane.

[Haterfree]

Serious questions arose about Cotto after he bowed to MIargarito & it seems questions continue to arise. He definitely is no shoe in for the Hall of Fame right now.

[Sin City]

Serious questions arose about Cotto after he bowed to MIargarito & it seems questions continue to arise. He definitely is no shoe in for the Hall of Fame right now.

How so? I guess Mayweather's status is also into question since he couldn't knock out Corley and Sosa and Miguel Cotto. Being that in your opinion Miguel Cotto's status is into question as to wether he is a good fighter or not, then so is Mayweather's since he did something Mayweather couldn't do.

[AntonTheMeh]

ricky at 147, wasn't all that bad.ricky lost to floyd, the former p4p best, and squeaked by vs collazo, who anyone could argue was just a bad style match up for hatton. i don't see why they don't make the fight at welter.this fight makes little sense at 140.none.people want to give hatton a chance at 140 cause of cotto's weight drainage.
(would you hatton fans really think that, that would be a win worth gloating about?)at 147 there are no excuses.for anyone.not even hatton.
i refuse to believe that 7 pounds makes that much a difference, in this match up.hatton would move up to fight oscar after he beats manny, that fight spells big dollars for hatton.if he's gonna go that route he can go and do that.
he'd have more *****'s loving em.by any means, do what you gotta do.so why not a cotto fight at 147?

cotto>>>>>>>hatton.

end of.
would be competitive, but it won't last.cotto's got this.

[paulie22315]

clearly.i mean, he lost, to probably the most(unnecessarily) hated on fighter in this forum( prior to his last fight at least).
he was hated on because, reportedly, Floyd ducked him.
(yes, I'm bringing floyd into this)
nevermind the fact that *****s want to argue that floyd wasn't a a true welter.
(ok then there was no point in fighting baldo for his belts.
duran, and mosley, are some fighters that skipped a div for a big fight, he could have skipped welter and fought oscar at 154)

before,last night, hatton was a bum, who many *****s chose to lose to paulie.
but now, that hatton beats paulie, he beats cotto;
because according to *****s, cotto isn't better than anyone floyd has fought.

triangle theory.(AWESOME!)
lets be clear about this match up.
(use the kostya fight as an example all you want, kostya is a one punch pony)
hatton will hit cotto, but cotto will hit hatton as well.
cotto is one of the best combo punchers in the game.
collazo laced hatton with combos all night. you think cotto isn't gonna do the same?
why?
cause the triangle theory doesn't come into play in an argument against a fighter that floyd fought?
great.
i understand that all you dudes are nuthuggin, also ran,
bandwagon jumpers, with Beatlemania screaming girl syndrome.
so it's ok.

now, don't get me wrong, ricky looked awesome last night.
but paulie IS NOT cotto.get that threw your head.
a weight drained cotto all ready proved he was better than paulie.
answer me this,(some triangle theory for ya)
could hatton throw and take as much as margarito did in that fight?

I'll answer that for you, NOPE.


this is about all the *****'s who seem to have jumped the hatton bandwagon (triangle theory punch drinkers) to make floyd bigger than cotto,
(which begs the question, why? when he all ready is? why the insecurity?)

you guys


why is it that you fools pull out the triangle theory when its convenient?

do any of you actually believe cotto beats floyd cause he beat judah, and sosa worst than floyd did?

NO.you don't.

you guys are special.

oh my god....another hatton hater,ok lets use the kostya tszyu fight as an example here then...
1. tszyu knocked out zab judah in round two of their fight,the ****in 2nd round! hatton whoops tszyu not long after,explain that brainiac.

2.in the malignaggi fight cotto won by two rounds only,however hatton won ten of the eleven before it was stopped,he beat paulie by nine rounds can you give me your excuse for that one then? let me guess weight drained or some dung like that,let me point out to you that hatton beat malignaggi far more convincingly than your beloved cotto, AND THAT IS A FACT IRREGUARDLESS OF WHAT YOU SAY PAL.

the great floyd mayweather ha? wins against hatton in the ringsize,weight category,venue selection referee(who many believe undoubtedly was bought) and judges in his favour and this makes him great?

listen buddy what you just wrote is absolute crap,cotto has a better resume than hatton? ah no.
and heres the thing im not ecevn english,im irish im just speaking the truth,americsans are totally buying into the hype,cotto is and was overrated,the chin?whats your excuse for that one?
bottom line is this,if hatton and cotto got it on at 140 hatton would take him to chinatown garunteed,cotto has beaten nobody worth talking about and zab judah definately aint worth talking about.

[paulie22315]

Hatton would give Cotto the biggest payday of his life.

Money talks.

i agree hatton would lay down the guidelines for where,when,what weight,and how much cotto would be paid not the other way round,hatton is the bigger star like it or not,he calls the shots,the way de la hoya did to mayweather n floyd did to ricky.

[TheSurgeonMDMPH]

wtf? is he talking in circles or shooting from his azz. the only thing is for certain is that he is pro cotto. everything else sounded like a souljaboy rap!