Tweet
clearly.i mean, he lost, to probably the most(unnecessarily) hated on fighter in this forum( prior to his last fight at least).
he was hated on because, reportedly, Floyd ducked him.
(yes, I'm bringing floyd into this)
nevermind the fact that *****s want to argue that floyd wasn't a a true welter.
(ok then there was no point in fighting baldo for his belts.
duran, and mosley, are some fighters that skipped a div for a big fight, he could have skipped welter and fought oscar at 154)
before,last night, hatton was a bum, who many *****s chose to lose to paulie.
but now, that hatton beats paulie, he beats cotto;
because according to *****s, cotto isn't better than anyone floyd has fought.
triangle theory.(AWESOME!)
lets be clear about this match up.
(use the kostya fight as an example all you want, kostya is a one punch pony)
hatton will hit cotto, but cotto will hit hatton as well.
cotto is one of the best combo punchers in the game.
collazo laced hatton with combos all night. you think cotto isn't gonna do the same?
why?
cause the triangle theory doesn't come into play in an argument against a fighter that floyd fought?
great.
i understand that all you dudes are nuthuggin, also ran,
bandwagon jumpers, with Beatlemania screaming girl syndrome.
so it's ok.
now, don't get me wrong, ricky looked awesome last night.
but paulie IS NOT cotto.get that threw your head.
a weight drained cotto all ready proved he was better than paulie.
answer me this,(some triangle theory for ya)
could hatton throw and take as much as margarito did in that fight?
I'll answer that for you, NOPE.
this is about all the *****'s who seem to have jumped the hatton bandwagon (triangle theory punch drinkers) to make floyd bigger than cotto,
(which begs the question, why? when he all ready is? why the insecurity?)
you guys
why is it that you fools pull out the triangle theory when its convenient?
do any of you actually believe cotto beats floyd cause he beat judah, and sosa worst than floyd did?
NO.you don't.
you guys are special.
he was hated on because, reportedly, Floyd ducked him.
(yes, I'm bringing floyd into this)
nevermind the fact that *****s want to argue that floyd wasn't a a true welter.
(ok then there was no point in fighting baldo for his belts.
duran, and mosley, are some fighters that skipped a div for a big fight, he could have skipped welter and fought oscar at 154)
before,last night, hatton was a bum, who many *****s chose to lose to paulie.
but now, that hatton beats paulie, he beats cotto;
because according to *****s, cotto isn't better than anyone floyd has fought.
triangle theory.(AWESOME!)
lets be clear about this match up.
(use the kostya fight as an example all you want, kostya is a one punch pony)
hatton will hit cotto, but cotto will hit hatton as well.
cotto is one of the best combo punchers in the game.
collazo laced hatton with combos all night. you think cotto isn't gonna do the same?
why?
cause the triangle theory doesn't come into play in an argument against a fighter that floyd fought?
great.
i understand that all you dudes are nuthuggin, also ran,
bandwagon jumpers, with Beatlemania screaming girl syndrome.
so it's ok.
now, don't get me wrong, ricky looked awesome last night.
but paulie IS NOT cotto.get that threw your head.
a weight drained cotto all ready proved he was better than paulie.
answer me this,(some triangle theory for ya)
could hatton throw and take as much as margarito did in that fight?
I'll answer that for you, NOPE.
this is about all the *****'s who seem to have jumped the hatton bandwagon (triangle theory punch drinkers) to make floyd bigger than cotto,
(which begs the question, why? when he all ready is? why the insecurity?)
you guys
why is it that you fools pull out the triangle theory when its convenient?
do any of you actually believe cotto beats floyd cause he beat judah, and sosa worst than floyd did?
NO.you don't.
you guys are special.
Comment