Calzaghe is favored over Dawson because of his status, i mean undefeated and beat great OLD legends...which means nothing look at pavlik, hopkins...... Dawson is in the same boat as paul williams and winky wright he'll be lucky if any great fighter takes a chance at fighting him.
Originally posted by KrisSilver
That is the case you bozo. Calzaghe is LHW champ and above Chad. Even in polls Calzaghe is favoured over Chad.
I was talking about the Hopkins fight, which happened, you idiot. Btw, he was #1, and Calzaghe beat him.
Johnson quite possibly brings more money than Dawson. Christ, are you on crack or naturally that ******?
That is the case you bozo. Calzaghe is LHW champ and above Chad. Even in polls Calzaghe is favoured over Chad.
I was talking about the Hopkins fight, which happened, you idiot. Btw, he was #1, and Calzaghe beat him.
Johnson quite possibly brings more money than Dawson. Christ, are you on crack or naturally that ******?
polls? what ****ing polls? the fight is not even being discussed....what ****ing, made-up fantasy nuthugging polls are you referring to???
i was talking about the hopkins fight too...the one that needs to re-happen....
you've got to be a ****ing idiot if you think glen johnson brings more money to the table than chad dawson.......i'm not even going to argue that point w/ you, but just by saying so, you're proven to be a ****ing idiot........
dawson beats the hell outta calzaghe. too fast, too strong.....
Dawson also went out of his way to fight a 40 years old Tarver. Before that, he got a gift against a 39 year old Johnson. Think about what you are saying.
But the point is that Dawson would not shy away from fighting a undefeated fighter in his 20's.
And I dont think he got a gift against Johnson, he won too many early rounds and just becuase Johnson looked good late does not mean he won.
Calzaghe is favored over Dawson because of his status, i mean undefeated and beat great OLD legends...which means nothing look at pavlik, hopkins...... Dawson is in the same boat as paul williams and winky wright he'll be lucky if any great fighter takes a chance at fighting him.
No he isn't, he's favoured over him, because he's favoured over him as a better fighter, whom would win the fight. Read up on frigging boxing for f uck's sake. Such moronic statements are what put people off these forums.
Calzaghe is favored over Dawson because of his status, i mean undefeated and beat great OLD legends...which means nothing look at pavlik, hopkins...... Dawson is in the same boat as paul williams and winky wright he'll be lucky if any great fighter takes a chance at fighting him.
bruh, im still waiting for someone to show me some polls, or explain to me who favors calzaghe over dawson, besides huggers?
But the point is that Dawson would not shy away from fighting a undefeated fighter in his 20's.
And I dont think he got a gift against Johnson, he won too many early rounds and just becuase Johnson looked good late does not mean he won.
I beg to differ regarding Dawson-Johnson, as did about 80% of the audience.
Kessler & Lacy were in their 20's, undefeated, and both were gonna beat Joe.
No he isn't, he's favoured over him, because he's favoured over him as a better fighter, whom would win the fight. Read up on frigging boxing for f uck's sake. Such moronic statements are what put people off these forums.
ahh, I get it.
you are being an idiot on purpose.
it is some type of attempt at sarcasm.
Comment