Why not Calzaghe vs. De La Hoya?

**Derranged** · 11-13-2008, 10:12 PM

DLH was crap at 160... at 175?? Not happening. Joe will most likely never fight below 175 again. Although imagine the money involved.....

**W1LL** · 11-13-2008, 10:19 PM

Fackin' Bump

**Derranged** · 11-13-2008, 10:21 PM

Originally posted by Counterpunch

Fackin' Bump

Is Eubank from the future?

**W1LL** · 11-13-2008, 10:22 PM

James Bond was based on Chris Eubank.

**Jim Jeffries** · 11-13-2008, 10:23 PM

Originally posted by Counterpunch

I'm sure De La Hoya is closer to Calzaghe's weight than Pacquiao's.

Well, Calzaghe would get ZERO credit for beating DLH, whereas Pac will get loads, despite Oscar being far past his best. DLH would have ZERO chance of beating Zag, whereas Pac has at least some chance of beating DLH.

**Clegg** · 11-13-2008, 10:24 PM

Even atheists believe in Chris Eubank.

That pretty much tells you all you need to know about who the real Messiah is.

**JulioCesaChavez** · 11-14-2008, 09:19 AM

Calslappy won't fight him unless he loses the next fight and is defo washed up. Calslappy only likes washed up fighters, but even then he got schooled v B-Hop.

**ophqui** · 11-14-2008, 09:23 AM

way too heavy for DLH, not really viable at all in my eyes. the money though. . .

**Sweetdrm** · 11-14-2008, 09:29 AM

Delahoya would not risk getting battered he is a businesses man first and a boxer second, you know?. He will stick to bullying shorter, way way less stronger opponents to uphold his image in the boxing world lol

I wish mayweather knock him out when they fought but i am still happy with the win and snub at the end.

Why not Calzaghe vs. De La Hoya?