Insider Notes: Dawson-Kessler, HBO Ratings, Joe's Future

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • *2TOUGH*
    Engineered Nutrition
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 5238
    • 1,515
    • 1,059
    • 12,567

    #21
    Originally posted by ggurtin
    joe Should Not Retire, But He Should Take Next Year Off, Or Give Bernard A Rematch If He Can Take Out Dawson Or Kessler.
    You Just Dont Like The Fact That Hes Undefeated And The Best.. You Want Him To Risk A Fight With Someone Else Just So You Can Talk **** After...

    calzaghe Won!!!

    Live
    With
    It !!!!

    Yank ****

    Comment

    • Ray  Ray
      HOLDIN IT DOWN`
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 7791
      • 451
      • 852
      • 20,693

      #22
      Originally posted by !! 2Tough !!
      tarver beat roy

      hopkins beat tarver

      hopkins beat johnson

      CALZAGHE BEAT hopkins

      CALZAGHE BEAT JONES..

      CALZAGHE IS THE LINEAR LT HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMP OF THE WORLD!!!
      Yeah... Great ananlogy!

      Comment

      • FLY TY
        T.L.R.N.A.
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 7514
        • 611
        • 377
        • 22,957

        #23
        Originally posted by sportsplato
        If Joe beats Dawson and the Kessler/Bernard winner again, he will be one of the Best of All-time. Then he gets put in the same breath as the Louis', and Robinson's, and the Ali's, and the Armstrong's, and the Leonard's. He would be rated higher than Floyd, Roy and Bernard. But Dawson needs to get some hype with him, because he is not a draw.
        i promise you joe wont fight dawson.....however, if he fights again he needs to fight dawson or give b-hop a rematch. no other fight makes sense...i said it b4 the jones fight, and i'll say it again, calzaghe would've gotten bigger props for beating dawson than for what he did to jones.......

        Originally posted by ggurtin
        Joe should not retire, but he should take next year off, or give Bernard a rematch if he can take out Dawson or Kessler.
        he's 36. can't afford to take a year off....maybe5 months tops, then decide what he's gonna do....

        by the way, did any1 read tea, kessler saying bad chad "needs more exposure before that fight can be made???"

        my bad, i didn't know kessler was world famous and a household name........

        Comment

        • shynequasiog22
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • May 2007
          • 449
          • 22
          • 162
          • 6,885

          #24
          Originally posted by sportsplato
          If Joe beats Dawson and the Kessler/Bernard winner again, he will be one of the Best of All-time. Then he gets put in the same breath as the Louis', and Robinson's, and the Ali's, and the Armstrong's, and the Leonard's. He would be rated higher than Floyd, Roy and Bernard. But Dawson needs to get some hype with him, because he is not a draw.
          Calzaghe doesn't get put in with Louis, SRR and the rest no matter who he beats from here on. And IMO he doesn't get rated higher than PBF, Roy or BHop regardless if he beats Dawson and a rematch. To me he didn't do enough through his career. Sure he is a top 100 fighter all time but I just don't think he did enough career wise to pass any of them.

          Comment

          • Kesslerfan#1
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 640
            • 48
            • 80
            • 8,978

            #25
            Originally posted by thuggah
            calzaghe should fight dawson but i don't think he wants none though. if he beats dawson then i believe he'll the best ones to ever do it. right now i'm not sold on him yet. roy was past his prime and hopkins is too! so dawson and he's the ****!!!!!!!
            Oh was Pavlik past his prime when Hopkins beat him??
            you dum ass!!
            People need to leave Calzaghe alone...I mean who has Dawson beaten???
            and who that Dawson has beaten...have they beaten???
            People are quick to jump on Calzaghes Resume' but the fact is he's beaten 46 warriors no matter what...half of the nuthuggers on here have never fought at all!!!!

            Comment

            • arod08
              Amateur
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 14
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,062

              #26
              I think Calslappy should fight again a young hungry fighter like Dawson. He fought 40 something unknown fighters in the UK and then he beat Lacy, Kessler and then a 43 year old Hopkins who actually gave a better performance than Jones. And both Hopkins and Jones are way past their prime at 40 and 43. Come on Joe the best UK fighter will always be Lennox because he cleaned out the division and unified belts. You have only ruled the Super middleweight, try winning belts in 4 different weight classes like Jones or have continue fighting until 43 like Hopkins!! The Truth is that you are looking for a quick exit and not willing to fight younger fighters like Dawson. You will be respected in UK but not here. If you would have fought Jones and Hopkins in their prime you would have lost..

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP