Better Legacy: Hopkins or Jones?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • βetamax
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 3838
    • 430
    • 55
    • 10,171

    #11
    Originally posted by The_Bringer
    Better how? As in more enertaining?

    And what years do you consider to be Hopkins prime? Because I even have a hard time pinning it down myself, though I think it started around 98-99 and ended around '04. But 'Nard seems hell bent on rewriting what "prime" acually means anyway.
    Sure, entertaining but I think a better overall fighter as well. Obviously Jones was the only person to ever convincingly beat Hopkins in '93, a time when neither was quite at their prime though Hopkins was a little more green. It is hard to pick exactly when Hopkins prime is/was but whether you pick Hopkins from '99, 01, etc. I think any version would get beat by a mid-90's Jones. It would probably be closer than their original fight but I'd still give the edge to Jones.

    Comment

    • ßringer
      **** Subtlety
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2006
      • 28180
      • 2,785
      • 2,762
      • 48,350

      #12
      Originally posted by mt102879
      Sure, entertaining but I think a better overall fighter as well. Obviously Jones was the only person to ever convincingly beat Hopkins in '93, a time when neither was quite at their prime though Hopkins was a little more green. It is hard to pick exactly when Hopkins prime is/was but whether you pick Hopkins from '99, 01, etc. I think any version would get beat by a mid-90's Jones. It would probably be closer than their original fight but I'd still give the edge to Jones.
      That's fair enough, can't argue with that.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP