So what did Abraham prove in beating up the outmatched Marquez?

[El Chicano]

Marquez is smaller, older, was never really that good. What did this fight prove? Why did it even take place? Abraham needs to step up.

[Avenue]

that Marquez needs to Retire asap

[BrooklynBomber]

Uhm, you do realize that Marquez was a mandatory that Abraham HAD to fight?

He did not prove anything but that he can beat up a decent lefty.

[Addition]

Ever heard of a mandatory?

[AntonTheMeh]

too ****ing bad.that's how the **** smells.what was abraham supposed to do? fight with one arm to even up the fight?stop being a contradictory **** head.coming from a marga fan this is hypocritical.

[El Chicano]

Uhm, you do realize that Marquez was a mandatory that Abraham HAD to fight?

He did not prove anything but that he can beat up a decent lefty.

that's what's wrong with boxing.

[TheGreatA]

It didn't prove anything but that's one overmatched mandatory out of the way, perhaps Abraham will fight Sturm or Pavlik next.

[Fox McCloud]

Uhm, you do realize that Marquez was a mandatory that Abraham HAD to fight?

He did not prove anything but that he can beat up a decent lefty.

Ever heard of a mandatory?

Good call both of you.

Thread starter... Make sure it's not a mandatory before talking **** on opponent choice.

[The_Bull]

Uhm, you do realize that Marquez was a mandatory that Abraham HAD to fight?

He did not prove anything but that he can beat up a decent lefty.

Mandatories? Who the **** fights mandatories these days?

[Allucard]

Ever heard of a mandatory?

aka guy picked up in a battle of two terrible guys to make the money maker man of the org (champ) look good?