Bigger win for Morales?

[kadyo's]

Since pac is better and bigger than marco then pac 1 is the better win. And like you mentioned, it was barrera who should have won the first fight contrary to what the three stoogies have decided.

[Fulcrum29]

yea to this day Morales holds the only and greatest convincing win over a PRIME Pacquaio. End of story.

[Dan...]

is that why he lost to barrera without question in the third barrera fight, and prior to pacquiao beating morales, morales lost in dominating fashion to Zahir raheem, a nobody

So if he was so old and shot how did he manage to outbox a guy who would then go on a run to the p4p number 1 spot in the sport?


Do you even like this sport? You just seem to hate on every fighter.

[kg21mvp]

his win over pac was bigger. and he clearly won unlike his win against barrera that any fan could make a case on the outcome that it should have gone either way. but his win agianst pac was not dominating, there were tough rounds to score in that fight but as a pac fan i did score the fight for morales.

[Tha_Greatest]

So if he was so old and shot how did he manage to outbox a guy who would then go on a run to the p4p number 1 spot in the sport?


Do you even like this sport? You just seem to hate on every fighter.

erik morales is my favorite all time fighter and without question i know he lost to barrera in third fight (old slow morales comeback in 3rd barrera fight to win was too late cause he was too slow in 3rd barrera fight by starting off too slow and Raheem made erik look like a slow punching bag)

[Miburo]

Pacquiao, like Ali before Foreman everyone thought he was finished after Barrera III.

[ferocity]

The Barrera win. The Barrera that fought Morales isn't the same one that fought Pacquiao, Pac got Barrera in there 1st fight not trained properly. What has Pacquiao done that Barrera basicly hasn't? Barrera could beat Diaz probably out of his prime and that weight is way out of Barreras in shape weight.

And its clear Morales wasn't the same fighter in the 3rd Barerra fight, he was suposed to be done after he lost to Barrera. The Pacquiao fight was Morales last great win, he was able to roll back the time just as Ali was with Foreman. Then after that he was done. Zahir Raheem beat Morales after the Pacquiao win, then Pac went on to beat Morales and in the 2nd fight it was clear Morales wasn't the same, he was more 1 punch at a time type of fighter and not the same fighter Pac fought the first time.

[kadyo's]

What has Pacquiao done that Barrera basicly hasn't?

Beating Barrera twice? Barrera couldn't have done that to himself twice.

[WhoreUs]

just curious why do everyone say erik dominated manny in the 1st fight?

it was a clear win for erik but it was hardly domination.

it was an entertaining , close fight. clear cut for erik but he hardly dominated.

7-5 is hardly dominated.

[WhoreUs]

The Barrera win. The Barrera that fought Morales isn't the same one that fought Pacquiao, Pac got Barrera in there 1st fight not trained properly. What has Pacquiao done that Barrera basicly hasn't? Barrera could beat Diaz probably out of his prime and that weight is way out of Barreras in shape weight.

And its clear Morales wasn't the same fighter in the 3rd Barerra fight, he was suposed to be done after he lost to Barrera. The Pacquiao fight was Morales last great win, he was able to roll back the time just as Ali was with Foreman. Then after that he was done. Zahir Raheem beat Morales after the Pacquiao win, then Pac went on to beat Morales and in the 2nd fight it was clear Morales wasn't the same, he was more 1 punch at a time type of fighter and not the same fighter Pac fought the first time.

beat marquez?

oh right manny never beat marquez......