Jones inspired by ***** victory (BBC)

[Clegg]

Trust me, there was a lot of people including myself who were crossing their fingers yesterday for an ***** win. That wouldn't be the case if it wasn't close leading up the voting especially considering the crooked things that have happened in the past.

Not to mention in the larger picture a black man becoming the president of the US is the ultimate case of the underdog winning.

LOL see what I mean? You never stop with this stuff.

Have you been on your march yet?

[βetamax]

LOL see what I mean? You never stop with this stuff.

Have you been on your march yet?

"This stuff"? Like showing concern about social issues? The fact that you mock people for this is really quite pathetic.

[Clegg]

How exactly were you showing concern for social issues in failing to understand a very simplistic point in order to give yet another unnecessary speech about race?

And mocking people in great fun, if you can find someone more ridiculous than yourself you should give a try

[βetamax]

How exactly were you showing concern for social issues in failing to understand a very simplistic point in order to give yet another unnecessary speech about race?

And mocking people in great fun, if you can find someone more ridiculous than yourself you should give a try

As if you give you damn? Your battle line is already drawn and you have no intention of listening to what I have to say, so I'm not going to waste my time. It's quite obvious I've gotten under your skin by saying some things do you don't want to hear and you've done nothing but resort to personal attacks in a shallow attempt to bring down my character.

[AndyShitHot]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/boxing/7712276.stm

Could someone please explain to Roy that in the US election the overwhelming favourite absolutely destroyed the aging underdog in a one-sided epic beatdown that surprised no-one?

Haha, that last paragraph combined with your P4P Dish List have made you my fav poster of the week

[Clegg]

As if you give you damn? Your battle line is already drawn and you have no intention of listening to what I have to say, so I'm not going to waste my time. It's quite obvious I've gotten under your skin by saying some things do you don't want to hear and you've done nothing but resort to personal attacks in a shallow attempt to bring down my character.

Remember what I was saying about having already made up your mind, and then just interpreting new events in a way that fits in with that?

As for drawing a battle line and not listening to others, take your own advice. On page 1 you said something. Squealpiggy pointed out the flaw in your position. And, despite being unable to respond to his points, you still maintained the exact same stance.

If someone offers valid criticism that you cannot refute, your response is to claim that you've "gotten under their skin". Good one

You think you've gotten under my skin, but you're the one talking about 'battle lines' and I'm the one using to express my opinion.

As for what I don't want to hear (that should be 'read' btw) I've already stated that I find your obsession with turning every NSB thread into a place for you to moan about race annoying, so credit to you for finally being able to work that one out.

[Mr. Ryan]

Barack ***** inspired me to do a radio show. About boxing.

[THE REED]

someone ****ing lied to me on here... Some idiot roy fan told me on here that roy was a mccain supporter and that they were dead serious.... God damn, people need to shut the **** up about **** like that. Cause I was spreading that rumor all over the internet

Il the one that told you that... and he was, i read the article about 4 months ago.. he actually endorsed mccain...

[βetamax]

Remember what I was saying about having already made up your mind, and then just interpreting new events in a way that fits in with that?

As for drawing a battle line and not listening to others, take your own advice. On page 1 you said something. Squealpiggy pointed out the flaw in your position. And, despite being unable to respond to his points, you still maintained the exact same stance.

If someone offers valid criticism that you cannot refute, your response is to claim that you've "gotten under their skin". Good one

You think you've gotten under my skin, but you're the one talking about 'battle lines' and I'm the one using to express my opinion.

As for what I don't want to hear (that should be 'read' btw) I've already stated that I find your obsession with turning every NSB thread into a place for you to moan about race annoying, so credit to you for finally being able to work that one out.

It's transparent what your doing. Supposedly as you've said your irritated at me for bringing up race but it's clear that it goes beyond that. Your upset at what I'm actually saying. The fact that you typed "have you been to a march today" tells me you basically think people who take racism seriously are oversensitive, irrational morons (Remember what I said about being privileged, huh?). However, since you can't handle an intelligent conversation on racism you resort to bringing down someones character since it's easier to rationalize the person doesn't know what they're talking about this way as your doing now. This is why I'm not going to engage in this nonsense your trying to bring me in to.

I will say however that your wrong on all counts. For example, you make it seem as though I was avoided the posters response when I actually said half-jokingly that I would continue to rant if he'd like, meaning I was willing to continue the discussion but I decided it would probably be better to keep politics out and let people enjoy the humor in it.

[Clegg]

It's transparent what your doing. Supposedly as you've said your irritated at me for bringing up race but it's clear that it goes beyond that. Your upset at what I'm actually saying. The fact that you typed "have you been to a march today" tells me you basically think people who take racism seriously are oversensitive, irrational morons (Remember what I said about being privileged, huh?). However, since you can't handle an intelligent conversation on racism you resort to bringing down someones character since it's easier to rationalize the person doesn't know what they're talking about this way as your doing now. This is why I'm not going to engage in this nonsense your trying to bring me in to.

This is all just your opinions. You're trying to tell me what I think, just like you did in our previous discussion. You could've asked, but you'd rather assume. That way you can go on with you ****** viewpoints. I haven't commented on people that take racism seriously, I've commented on you and only you.

It took you over an hour and a half to write this nonsense. Are you that ******? And why are you unable to spell simple words? I don't bother attempting intelligent discussion with you because you are ridiculously biased and rarely offer anything that could be regarded as intelligent.

The march comment was clearly a reference to our previous discussion. If you can't understand a reference to something from 2 days ago then I expect that this discussion is going to get even more tedious with your next reply

I will say however that your wrong on all counts. For example, you make it seem as though I was avoided the posters response when I actually said half-jokingly that I would continue to rant if he'd like, meaning I was willing to continue the discussion but I decided it would probably be better to keep politics out and let people enjoy the humor in it.

No, you ducked his point. And if you think it's better to keep that stuff out of it, then I agree. Which makes me wonder why the hell you bring it up every single day on what is a BOXING forum.

But hey, thanks for admitting that I am right and that you are wrong, and that what you posted is better left out of it.

The above post is one of the silliest things I've read on here. I hope that your next attempt at my biography and psychoanalysis is a bit more impressive.