You ought to make a Hopkins/Kessler topic man... it's interesting, and will be lost in this thread that is primarily supposed to be about Dawson/Kessler.
Kessler: Risk Can Reap Rewards…so Why Not Dawson?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Either way, it doesn't really matter.
Diaconu's talent isn't going anywhere for a while.
Fighting Tarver and Johnson now was imperative because they aren't getting any younger, and the sooner you can fight them, the more credit you will get for beating them.Comment
-
Dawson needs to fight some top contenders as well as the ageing fighters. It is not as if beating Tarver and Johnson has done that much for his resume assuming he fights on and beats other fighters in the coming years.
I'd love to see Dawson v kessler. I'd be supporting Kessler but I'd find it a tough right to pick. Perhaps Dawson by decision, but Kessler has the power to KO Dawson no doubt.Comment
-
No. Try reading what I wrote please. I only stated that it can be ARGUED. It really isn't so difficult to comprehend.
That's right. No question that Team Kessler treated the first round of negotiations bad. Esecially when one considers that they managed to p!ss off showtime in the process.Comment
Comment