It's all in the title really. If a fight is ruled as a split decision, where 1 judge rules for one fighter and the other 2 judges rule for the other fighter, should there always be an immediate rematch? Should it be a part of general boxing rules, the same as a low blow, the same as no biting.. If a fight is ruled a Split Decision should every governing body have a mandatory rematch rule? Split Decision = Immediate Rematch - a new rule in boxing?
Should a Split Decision always lead to an Immediate Rematch?
Collapse
-
It's all in the title really. If a fight is ruled as a split decision, where 1 judge rules for one fighter and the other 2 judges rule for the other fighter, should there always be an immediate rematch? Should it be a part of general boxing rules, the same as a low blow, the same as no biting.. If a fight is ruled a Split Decision should every governing body have a mandatory rematch rule? Split Decision = Immediate Rematch - a new rule in boxing? -
-
It's all in the title really. If a fight is ruled as a split decision, where 1 judge rules for one fighter and the other 2 judges rule for the other fighter, should there always be an immediate rematch? Should it be a part of general boxing rules, the same as a low blow, the same as no biting.. If a fight is ruled a Split Decision should every governing body have a mandatory rematch rule? Split Decision = Immediate Rematch - a new rule in boxing?Comment
-
Comment
-
Of course not.
Would you have wanted to see a rematch between Jermaine Taylor and Cory Spinks?
Should Floyd Mayweather-Oscar De La Hoya have been a SD? No. Tom Kaczmareck has cataract problems.Comment
Comment