Should a Split Decision always lead to an Immediate Rematch?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gorguruga
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2007
    • 300
    • 9
    • 1
    • 395

    #1

    Should a Split Decision always lead to an Immediate Rematch?

    It's all in the title really. If a fight is ruled as a split decision, where 1 judge rules for one fighter and the other 2 judges rule for the other fighter, should there always be an immediate rematch? Should it be a part of general boxing rules, the same as a low blow, the same as no biting.. If a fight is ruled a Split Decision should every governing body have a mandatory rematch rule? Split Decision = Immediate Rematch - a new rule in boxing?
  • Stickman
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 3352
    • 160
    • 63
    • 9,835

    #2
    Originally posted by Gorguruga
    It's all in the title really. If a fight is ruled as a split decision, where 1 judge rules for one fighter and the other 2 judges rule for the other fighter, should there always be an immediate rematch? Should it be a part of general boxing rules, the same as a low blow, the same as no biting.. If a fight is ruled a Split Decision should every governing body have a mandatory rematch rule? Split Decision = Immediate Rematch - a new rule in boxing?
    No, because there are some real farking morons for judges, and if you rematched every SD, you'd end up with alot of lopsided or boring fights people would have to sit through.

    Comment

    • boxasmash
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 7039
      • 222
      • 63
      • 14,591

      #3
      calzaghe vs hopkins was sd when it wasnt really that close, same with mayweather vs oscar

      Comment

      • AntonTheMeh
        STOP CRYIN
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 21222
        • 700
        • 709
        • 31,623

        #4
        yeah, why not.

        Comment

        • prmarcos1
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 110
          • 5
          • 23
          • 6,180

          #5
          if its a sd let it be, but it should be a rule if the fight ends in a draw then a rematch should happen

          Comment

          • Pullcounter
            no guts no glory
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 42582
            • 549
            • 191
            • 49,739

            #6
            Originally posted by Gorguruga
            It's all in the title really. If a fight is ruled as a split decision, where 1 judge rules for one fighter and the other 2 judges rule for the other fighter, should there always be an immediate rematch? Should it be a part of general boxing rules, the same as a low blow, the same as no biting.. If a fight is ruled a Split Decision should every governing body have a mandatory rematch rule? Split Decision = Immediate Rematch - a new rule in boxing?
            no because some fights will always end in a SD, like Pac v. Marquez.

            Comment

            • Pullcounter
              no guts no glory
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2004
              • 42582
              • 549
              • 191
              • 49,739

              #7
              Originally posted by boxasmash
              calzaghe vs hopkins was sd when it wasnt really that close, same with mayweather vs oscar
              calzaghe barely beat hopkins.

              floyd clearly beat dlh, it should've been unanimous, but you know there was big money in the rematch so floyd got the SD.

              Comment

              • Thread Stealer
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2007
                • 9657
                • 439
                • 102
                • 17,804

                #8
                Of course not.

                Would you have wanted to see a rematch between Jermaine Taylor and Cory Spinks?

                Should Floyd Mayweather-Oscar De La Hoya have been a SD? No. Tom Kaczmareck has cataract problems.

                Comment

                • Ryn0
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 11139
                  • 310
                  • 269
                  • 20,767

                  #9
                  Jt-Spinks, Calzaghe-Hopkins, Floyd-DLH incredibly boring fights would you want to see them again?

                  Comment

                  • warp1432
                    the mailman
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 14406
                    • 478
                    • 347
                    • 24,060

                    #10
                    Seriously. Should Mijares-Munoz or Mijares-Navarro really be a rematch? No.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP