Who has had the best career?
Collapse
-
The biggest reason I went with Manny over Bhop: Manny moved up more weight divisions. Although I do think Manny has beaten slightly better opposition than Bhop has.Comment
-
Oh ok i know you are proclaiming that erik is not prime when pacman beat him.. IMO when they fought the first time pacman enter a new weight that is not his territory and he pays it... when erik fought not in his territory vs raheem the result is same with pacman... They are both prime but not in their territories... And pacman is evolving as a ****er to boxer and started using his right hook while morales is always the morales we know, Warrior and got a heart of lion... Prime Morales vs evolving pacman... pacman won..Morales's losses to Pacquiao were in no way his prime. You can argue not shot, and how little deterioration he had, but... I just watched Barrera-Morales III the other night, and he looked worse than he usually did in that fight. Couple that with the absolute fiasco against Zahir Raheem... idk how you can say morales was prime.
Trinidad beat Vargas, Whitaker, De La Hoya, etc. Pretty damn good names to compare with the Mexican featherweight trio of Barrera, Morales and Marquez IMO.
Vargas, Whitaker and Dela hoya is pretty good names indeed but not near the legacy of Morales and Barrera... no need marquez... Now look pacman is fighting Dela Hoya that half size bigger than him... fighting at 106 - 147 is just so freak... Mate 1 of my favorite fighters of all time is erik too... we're at the same side...
It's just all my opinion...
Comment
-
-
Comment

Comment