I wouldn't go as far as saying that Kelly Pavlik was overrated. The problem is that Pavlik fought Bernard Hopkins, many of the so-called boxing experts underrate him. Hopkins has won fights that he was suppose to loose which include: Felix Tito Trinidad, Oscar De La Hoya, Antonio Tarver, Winky Wrght, and Kelly Pavik. I think Kelly Pavlik has a good future in the 160lbs (middleweight division). Pavlik fought Bernard Hopkins at light heavyweight, I think that effected him. [IMG]http://i224.***********.com/albums/dd120/joeybalderas10/KP.jpg[/IMG]
Calzaghe: "Pavlik Was Exposed, Overrated, Overhyped"
Collapse
-
-
pavlik doesnt deserve a fight now but to say he didnt before the hopkins fight is ******ed. he ko'd and decisioned taylor , taylor beat hopkins twice, joe beat hopkins 5 years later and besides that, guys like kessler and lacy are his two biggest fights besides that, and they both suck.Comment
-
You didn't? The man's an arsehole when he wants to be. When he was coming through the ranks he was even more arrogant and outspoken. I know you have to be confident to be a boxer but he's borderline arrogant. Lucky he can back it up!!Comment
-
Comment
-
Cardiff, Wales - As he continues to prepare for his November 8 "Battle of the Superpowers" against Roy Jones, Jr at Madison Square Garden in New York City and live on HBO Pay-Per-View, undefeated light heavyweight champion Joe Calzaghe took a quick break from training to share his thoughts on Saturday night's tremendous victory for Bernard Hopkins over Kelly Pavlik. Here is what he had to say [details]
That's like Elton John calling somebody a f*ggotComment
-
Calzaghe can be a prick, I try to like this guy as a person at least, but he says some dumb ****. Can't say I didn't see it coming, but I though Enzo would be doing all the talking.Comment
-
Watch the actual interview hes actually no way near as harsh as the usual Vester title and wording suggests. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7679356.stmComment
Comment