Seeing how power punchers got nothing against B-Hop, how would Tommy Hearns do against Bernard? Prime for prime at Middleweight who wins and how?
B-Hop vs Tommy Hearns at prime Middle, who wins?
Collapse
-
B-Hop vs Tommy Hearns at prime Middle, who wins?
17Hopkins controls the fight, wins UD35.29%6Hopkins beats him to the punch, late stoppage35.29%6Hearns proves he's a good enough boxer, wins Dec17.65%3Hearns has too much power AND skill, KOs B-Hop11.76%2Tags: None -
-
-
Hearns UD. Tommy had awesome power but Bernard got good defense and great chin.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3Comment
-
this is quite a matchup that I was thinking of recently too. Hearns had amazing boxing ability, and more than enough power to keep Hopkins defensive minded.
on the other hand...its Bernard. I can easily see him pulling out something like Barkley did on Hearns, even though he didnt have the power that Barkley did. plus his body work and excellent infighting ability could very well break down Hearns as the fight went on.
so I would overall favor Hopkins more, but Hearns has a great chance too...kind of like a 65% chance of Hopkins winning.Comment
-
Hearns isn't a one-dimensional "power puncher" like Tito or Pavlik, he's a great boxer who happens to have tremendous power. He actually has a tremendous left hook, so Bernard couldn't just step away to the right against him. I'd say Hearns by close decision based on workrate and clean punches, but I doubt he'd KO Hopkins.Comment
-
At 160, Hopkins would beat Hearns every day of the week. Contrary to popular belief, Hearns was not solid enough at 160 to beat a fighter like Hopkins. At 6-1 Hopkins is as tall as Hearns and Hearns was knocked out by both Iran Barkley and Hagler at that weight. Hearns was nearly knocked out by James Kinchen and got away with a gift decision in that one. Hearns was awesome at 147 and great at 154. But at 160 he would never beat Hopkins. Hopkins by late KO.Last edited by joseph5620; 10-19-2008, 09:16 PM.Comment
-
Comment