Pavlik vs Kessler: Who wins?

[BattlingNelson]

I don't think Pavlik is completely worthless now that he has lost, his size and pressure will give other top fighters trouble but you've got to question how he can possibly come back from that loss to Hopkins.

There are a lot of unanswered questions about Kessler as well in my opinion. The Haussler fight will prove nothing unless Kessler struggles with him.

Exactly. The Haussler fight is a no-win situation for Kessler.

[Steak]

My post was definetely not directed at you. You are a fine poster with some good well tought out opinions.

I just feel this poll is classic NSB. On the bandwaggon - Off the bandwaggon.

I know, I was agreeing with you and adding to the discussion. haha. I mean, look what happened to Cotto and his 'fans', and he actually was extremely competitive in his loss.

[TheGreatA]

Exactly. The Haussler fight is a no-win situation for Kessler.

Maybe Kessler will 'Gary Lockett' Haussler and people will start talking about him again... Or maybe not.

[Simply The Best]

I love that word, 'exposed'. Everyone saw how slow, plodding and straightfoward Pavlik was before the Hopkins fight. he still had wins over Jermain Taylor anyway, because of his other good qualities.

and the Tyson example was terrible. Tyson lost practically every round and was KOed. he looked worse than usual and Douglas looked way better than usual, same thing with Pavlik and Hopkins.

Tyson was ****ining **** hookers by the dozen when he should have been training, that is my point. A focussed Tyson would have ripped Douglas head off inside 2 rounds. Pavlik was healthy and he was in shape though, B-HOP beats him 10 times out of 10. Tyson beats Douglas 9 times out of 10.

Jermain Taylor was a B-level fighter, he was not the same fighter who fought B-HOP. This was evident against Spinks, Ouma and Winky.

PS.

Bat, ive never been on the bandwagon mate.

[boxingfan405]

Kessler easy night victory