Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How did you score Calzaghe/Hopkins??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Forgot now. But I had Joe winning. I wanted to score for Bernard but he didn't do enough. Neither guy really won rounds convincingly. Both guys are real awkward.

    Comment


    • #42
      114-113 Calzaghe.

      Comment


      • #43
        116-111 Calzaghe.

        Comment


        • #44
          I don't understand why so many people called this a robbery, alot of you had scores like 114-113, 115-112 to Hopkns which are extremely close, IMO Calzaghe won 7 rounds to 5 with an extra point for the KD.

          Comment


          • #45
            Good Thread because I watched and scored this fight AGAIN yesterday while waiting for B-Hop vs Pavlik........I had Hopkins winning 6 of the first 8 rounds......Calz was bringin' it but he wasn't doing NO damage. B-Hop landed the harder more effective shots. I gave Calz 3 of the last 4 as B-Hop began to tire and bull**** his way through. I had it 115-112 Hopkins......

            Comment


            • #46
              i had calz winning by 1 round.

              Comment


              • #47
                115-113 hopkins

                Comment


                • #48
                  This fight really felt like a draw, with the scoring system I had Calzaghe up by a point, but thought Hopkins is the better man. I wouldn't mind seeing a rematch.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Tengoshi View Post
                    114-113 Hopkins. Those who had Hopkins ahead tended toward this score.
                    Mine was pretty much this because of the knockdown in round one.I thought that should have made the difference in points.But Bhop did gas out toward the end but calzaghe wasnt landing anything clean.Just a gew slaps here and there that werent affective.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      115-112 Hopkins

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP