170 is not Pavlik's weight.. He would destroy Hopkins at 160

[MakeDamnSure]

how can anyone take a pinoy (pac nuthugger) seriously? close thread.

Red K and Report your post again for being racist.

[BmoreBrawler]

destroy hopkins at 160.................yeah.Pavlik would look a little better but come on man he might have got a extra round thats about it..

Agreed. Its obvious that Pavlik had an off night, but its hard to see him beating Hopkins just because of a weight difference after tonight.

[hotshoes]

His rematch with Taylor was a catchweight at 168 and 170 at Hopkins..

Pavlik is a Natural middleweight and he would destroy Hopkins there.

damn man i'm pissed that pavlik lost but that's no reason to make embarrassing excuses like these

[Reggie Miller]

you can't destroy the executioner...not even at 160.

the man ruled the division for 10 years!

[RisAri0]

these guys both fought at what they'd be fighting at middleweight on fight night!...so that defeat's the argument...just like saying how some people thought hatton would beat Floyd at 140 instead when Hatton at fight night fought at that weight all his life.

[KnockoutTheFat]

why don't you makedamnsure what the correct catchweight was, for Pavlik/Taylor 2. it was at 166.

LOL

[boxingsmash69]

LOL

nice avatar. Hopkins vs. Hagler @ 160, who u got???

i got hopkins by SD

[Silencers]

I doubt any version of Pavlik at any weight would have defeated Hopkins.

[MrMark1]

His rematch with Taylor was a catchweight at 168 and 170 at Hopkins..

Pavlik is a Natural middleweight and he would destroy Hopkins there.

Give B-Hop some credit homie..............

[-EX-]

Prime for prime Hopkins would TKO Pavlik. Hate it or Love it.