Hopkins vs Calzaghe II - Who Wins (poll)

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #11
    Originally posted by egreezy
    Hopkins was not more agressive?
    Hopkins looked better because Pavlik is not a very good fighter. He's not in Hopkins' or Calzaghe's league. Ive said it all along. Calzaghe made Hopkins look his age. Pavlik made Hopkins looked a million quid.

    Comment

    • roundingace
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 1288
      • 31
      • 0
      • 7,682

      #12
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK


      It was the same - actually older - Hopkins that showed up tonight. Pavlik is just ****ing ****e.
      No my dim witted friend, Hopkins of tonight was a different fighter. Joe loses that split decision and I would say by UD if THIS Hopkins would of faced him tonight. You can say what you want but my opinion won't change.

      Comment

      • MikeBrew328
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 1988
        • 46
        • 12
        • 8,228

        #13
        Hopkins wins decisively. People forget that Nazeem Richardson is his main trainer. Roach was like oil and water. If he was trained by Naz for the Calslappy fight Hop would've dominated

        Comment

        • Squabbles94806
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 2408
          • 54
          • 104
          • 2,886

          #14
          Originally posted by boxasmash
          if hopkins fought like he did tonight (not holding as much, coming forward etc etc) he wold have been koed through exhaustion.

          pavlik is not calzaghe
          I agree...if Hopkins tonight shows up for the Calzaghe fight II then maybe he might have a chance at beating him. But by the time that fight will happen Hopkins will be on the near side of 43.

          Pavlik is still young. I think he'll bounce back and be a better fighter after being taken to school by hopkins.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #15
            Originally posted by roundingace
            No my dim witted friend, Hopkins of tonight was a different fighter. Joe loses that split decision and I would say by UD if THIS Hopkins would of faced him tonight. You can say what you want but my opinion won't change.
            Hahaha bitter boy. Your boy got schooled. A 12 round demolition by a 43 year old Hopkins.

            Amazing how low people will go to discredit Calzaghe. He WON. Pavlik got a 12 round beating. Hopkins was OLDER. Pavlik is just not very good and thats why Hopkins was allowed to toy with his limited arse the way he did.

            Comment

            • lparm
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 6605
              • 353
              • 209
              • 63,788

              #16
              Hopkins fought a great fight tonight, but he had his chance against Cal and was beaten. People are acting like Hop never fought aggressively against Cal, watch the fight again guys because Hop did take the fight to him early. Then Cal adapted and beat him late. Nothing changes if they rematch.

              Comment

              • Bobby Shaw
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2007
                • 4308
                • 236
                • 29
                • 39,810

                #17
                Originally posted by Gorguruga
                This fight has a chance of being made but so could Jones vs Hopkins, depending on the Jones vs Calzaghe bout.. The split decision loss against Calzaghe becomes more questionable with Hopkins domination of Pavlik. Hopkins was simply unlucky for the decision to not go his way and, in contrast, Calzaghe was lucky to win. It was a very close fight which is deserving of a rematch.
                Forget this fight ,it wont happen.Roy will KO Joe and Hopkins will fight Roy.Joe will retire when he finds that the canvass is not a comfortable place to spent time on during a fight

                Comment

                • roundingace
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 1288
                  • 31
                  • 0
                  • 7,682

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  Hahaha bitter boy. Your boy got schooled. A 12 round demolition by a 43 year old Hopkins.

                  Amazing how low people will go to discredit Calzaghe. He WON. Pavlik got a 12 round beating. Hopkins was OLDER. Pavlik is just not very good and thats why Hopkins was allowed to toy with his limited arse the way he did.
                  I take my hat off to Bernard. He gave kelly a one sided lesson and a good one at that. I'm not mad or a hater. But to try and say that Hop who fought Jc was the same Hop you saw tonight, is just downright moronic. It's okay, Kelly is still young and will definitely learn from this. JC will be in similar shoes come the 18th when Roy turns back the hands of time like Hop did.

                  Comment

                  • ACHlLLES
                    watch ur mouth
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 8398
                    • 236
                    • 359
                    • 15,211

                    #19
                    speed kills, hopkins hates faster fighters. Thats why Calzaghe had hopkins gassing out in there fight.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #20
                      Originally posted by roundingace
                      I take my hat off to Bernard. He gave kelly a one sided lesson and a good one at that. I'm not mad or a hater. But to try and say that Hop who fought Jc was the same Hop you saw tonight, is just downright moronic. It's okay, Kelly is still young and will definitely learn from this. JC will be in similar shoes come the 18th when Roy turns back the hands of time like Hop did.
                      You're right.

                      He was 7 months older.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP