Pavlik Will Destroy Hopkins!!!!

[Ray*]

this bump was intended to point and laugh at the thread starter and those that predicted incorrectly. Who cares about Calzaghe-Hopkins, it was an ugly fight, move on.

Now back to making fun of pavlik nuthuggers. We need to remind them of the past to keep them in check

I love thread starters like this one either gets ban or disappear after a bold prediction like this one.

[daggum]

i think you need too move on

yea i make a good point now it's time to move on. are you surrendering gary lockett style?

[Spray_resistant]

workrate is code for missing punches. do you know how to score boxing matches? missing punches is not in there anywhere. where exactly does missing punches fit into defense, clean punching, effective agression, or ring generalship? please explain. obviously missing punches wont go under defense, clean punching, or effective agression cause it's not effective to be agressive but miss. could missing punches go under ring generalship? possibly. you could use missing punches as a way to bully someone around the ring but still calzaghe kept falling into hopkins traps and getting countered and he was never able to corner hopkins cause he would just slip away. it just looked like calzaghe was following him around the ring without a plan.

If you need that much text to prove your points, you lost.

[daggum]

If you need that much text to prove your points, you lost.

yea i could just be a simpleton like you and say CALZAGHE WON ON WORKRATE DERRRRRRRRRRR. what a way to analyze the fight!

[starjammer]

In a way the thread starter was right. Pavlik did destroy Hopkins, because what has Hopkins done since Oct 08

Perhaps the thread starter meant the thread title in a metaphorical sense. Big props are deserved.

...lol

[Sir Tom Jones]

says the calzaghe fan who was ****** in by phrases like undefeated! 21 title defenses! lacy is the next tyson!

Yeah he was undefeated. Now go cry about that again.


As for the lacy comment. It was the Americans who had him as favourite and 'exposing' calzaghe.

We all know how that went.

[Spray_resistant]

yea i could just be a simpleton like you and say CALZAGHE WON ON WORKRATE DERRRRRRRRRRR. what a way to analyze the fight!

He landed more he threw more, he won.....I don't see how anyone could claim B-hop won or how anyone could be so obsessed with a fight that happened a pretty long time ago and rant about it everyday on a forum even in unrelated threads.......you clearly have some other issue with Joe that effected your scoring of the fight, I am starting to think you are actually Jeff Lacy.

[daggum]

In a way the thread starter was right. Pavlik did destroy Hopkins, because what has Hopkins done since Oct 08

Perhaps the thread starter meant the thread title in a metaphorical sense. Big props are deserved.

...lol

that's true. he did destroy his career in the same way hopkins destroyed calzaghe's career and forced him into early retirement. even though officially he "won" he lost all confidence and knew he couldn't compete with the best so he went on a dancing show to crave his fame desire instead of losing to dawson or hopkins in a rematch.

[Sir Tom Jones]

daggum is a white american who cries about what European fighters do.

He talks about Calzaghe with an unhealthy passion and obsession.

He also dislikes Froch.

[daggum]

He landed more he threw more, he won.....I don't see how anyone could claim B-hop won or how anyone could be so obsessed with a fight that happened a pretty long time ago and rant about it everyday on a forum even in unrelated threads.......you clearly have some other issue with Joe that effected your scoring of the fight, I am starting to think you are actually Jeff Lacy.

he did not land more that is a fallacy. if you want to know the truth go back and watch the fight and count for yourself. i'm sure you won't do that cause you dont want to know the truth. keep being ignorant and believing compubox.

you don't see how a guy who landed all the clean punches while barely being grazed could win? yea what insanity. like i said you didn't watch the fight closely. aka tunnel vision. you saw calzaghe throwing a lot and naturally thought oh he must be winning. how wrong you are.