Pavlik Will Destroy Hopkins!!!!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • S A M U R A I
    Bulletproof
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 181694
    • 1,495
    • 1,324
    • 1,419,318

    #41
    Man, who he hell cares about Hopkins-Calzaghe?

    Why are people still talking about such a ****ty fight? Move on.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

    Comment

    • El Castigador
      Banned
      • Dec 2009
      • 4151
      • 140
      • 0
      • 4,869

      #42
      Originally posted by daggum
      hopkins had no trouble at all landing cleanly.
      I had it 114-113 Hopkins.

      Comment

      • Spray_resistant
        Edgelord Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 29159
        • 2,702
        • 1,439
        • 53,384

        #43
        Originally posted by daggum
        so how did calzaghe win then? guess who was doing all the clean punching. hopkins duh. that was implied in the post. hopkins was doing all the clean punching while not getting hit. how can he possibly think he was losing?
        Why are you so obsessed with discrediting Joe and insistent that he landed NO punches in the fight when only a small minority think that B-hop won by landing 2 clean hard shots per round?

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43345
          • 4,516
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #44
          Originally posted by Spray_resistant
          Why are you so obsessed with discrediting Joe and insistent that he landed NO punches in the fight when only a small minority think that B-hop won by landing 2 clean hard shots per round?
          small minority=entire press row. yea got it. way to exaggerate. calzaghe landed literally no clean punches in some rounds. you need to watch the fight again without tunnel vision. yes he landed a few clean punches in the fight but not nearly enough to win. hopkins outlanded him in clean punches and shut him down for the most part.

          Comment

          • Sir Tom Jones
            It's Not Unusual.
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 3493
            • 264
            • 582
            • 12,867

            #45
            I joined this forum around the time of this fight,

            i hated the buzz around kelly.

            i just hope people aren't foolish enough to get ****** in again.

            Comment

            • daggum
              All time great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 43345
              • 4,516
              • 3
              • 166,270

              #46
              Originally posted by Sir Tom Jones
              I joined this forum around the time of this fight,

              i hated the buzz around kelly.

              i just hope people aren't foolish enough to get ****** in again.
              says the calzaghe fan who was ****** in by phrases like undefeated! 21 title defenses! lacy is the next tyson!

              Comment

              • Spray_resistant
                Edgelord Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 29159
                • 2,702
                • 1,439
                • 53,384

                #47
                Originally posted by daggum
                small minority=entire press row. yea got it. way to exaggerate. calzaghe landed literally no clean punches in some rounds. you need to watch the fight again without tunnel vision. yes he landed a few clean punches in the fight but not nearly enough to win. hopkins outlanded him in clean punches and shut him down for the most part.
                because a press row consists of so many ppl right great point, Most ppl disagree with you, and the fact that you push the issue so much and have sigs like that makes you hard for anyone to take seriously. It makes it seem like you have some bias against Joe while you accuse others of tunnel vision. Most ppl think Joe won on workrate and in large part due to B-hops passiveness and unwillingness to consistently maintain any offense.

                Comment

                • The_Demon
                  Big dog
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 13603
                  • 1,354
                  • 888
                  • 22,971

                  #48
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  if you keep pretending calzaghe "won" then yes. he couldn't even touch hopkins and the only reason he won was he threw more to fool the judges. which is better boxing? making your opponent miss and landing clean accurate punches or throwing and missing all your punches while following your opponent around the ring like a lap dog. take your choice.
                  jesus even bhops most hardcore fans have accepted that loss

                  why are you obsessed with calzaghe?

                  Comment

                  • daggum
                    All time great
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 43345
                    • 4,516
                    • 3
                    • 166,270

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Spray_resistant
                    because a press row consists of so many ppl right great point, Most ppl disagree with you, and the fact that you push the issue so much and have sigs like that makes you hard for anyone to take seriously. It makes it seem like you have some bias against Joe while you accuse others of tunnel vision. Most ppl think Joe won on workrate and in large part due to B-hops passiveness and unwillingness to consistently maintain any offense.
                    workrate is code for missing punches. do you know how to score boxing matches? missing punches is not in there anywhere. where exactly does missing punches fit into defense, clean punching, effective agression, or ring generalship? please explain. obviously missing punches wont go under defense, clean punching, or effective agression cause it's not effective to be agressive but miss. could missing punches go under ring generalship? possibly. you could use missing punches as a way to bully someone around the ring but still calzaghe kept falling into hopkins traps and getting countered and he was never able to corner hopkins cause he would just slip away. it just looked like calzaghe was following him around the ring without a plan.

                    Comment

                    • The_Demon
                      Big dog
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 13603
                      • 1,354
                      • 888
                      • 22,971

                      #50
                      Originally posted by daggum
                      workrate is code for missing punches. do you know how to score boxing matches? missing punches is not in there anywhere. where exactly does missing punches fit into defense, clean punching, effective agression, or ring generalship? please explain. obviously missing punches wont go under defense, clean punching, or effective agression cause it's not effective to be agressive but miss. could missing punches go under ring generalship? possibly. you could use missing punches as a way to bully someone around the ring but still calzaghe kept falling into hopkins traps and getting countered and he was never able to corner hopkins cause he would just slip away. it just looked like calzaghe was following him around the ring without a plan.
                      i think you need too move on

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP