Originally posted by jabsRstiff
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is it about these big guys?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GranTorinoHey man, I just call it like I see it. Deal with it. Fact of the matter is, you need different skills to fight at heavy to be successful. End of story. Dont cry to me and call me names just because you cant back up your point of view.
Who's crying ?
Whatever the reason, heavyweights just don't offer all that the smaller guys do.
the action.....the variety of skills...the endurance....
the smaller guys have it all over the bigger guys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jabsRstiffWho's crying ?
Whatever the reason, heavyweights just don't offer all that the smaller guys do.
the action.....the variety of skills...the endurance....
the smaller guys have it all over the bigger guys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GranTorinoWell, you have to remember, they dont offer what the smaller guys offer, they offer something completely different. They offer the prospect of serious bodily harm. They offer the possibility of satisfying all of our macabre curiosity. They offer damage. Pure and unadulterated. Thats the draw. The new boxing fan could, in my opinion, give a **** less about two little guys pecking on one another for an hour. But let two brutes get in there and start ****ing? Well ****, now we got a party! I hope I was able to articulate that correctly. Too much caffeine.
Wrong....
Take a look at the best KO's this year....they're all from BELOW the heavyweight division.
you are under the false belief that the big guys are more likely to score a KO, & you are wrong.
Wait until this PPV on Nov. 13th. I am positive you will not only see the four WORST fights of the year....but that NONE of them end in a convincing knockout.
Also....talk about "damage".
The smaller guys inflict FAR MORE damage on each other.
Look at the ring tragedies....virtually none are from the heavyweight division.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GranTorinoWell, you have to remember, they dont offer what the smaller guys offer, they offer something completely different. They offer the prospect of serious bodily harm. They offer the possibility of satisfying all of our macabre curiosity. They offer damage. Pure and unadulterated. Thats the draw. The new boxing fan could, in my opinion, give a **** less about two little guys pecking on one another for an hour. But let two brutes get in there and start ****ing? Well ****, now we got a party! I hope I was able to articulate that correctly. Too much caffeine.
Comment
-
Originally posted by joseand this is why no one respect your boxing opnion. You just showed a complete lack of knowledge and respect for the sport
I could give less than a **** about your respect for my opion, big boy. Im not here to gain your respect, Im here to post my opinion. Get used to it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jabsRstiffWrong....
Take a look at the best KO's this year....they're all from BELOW the heavyweight division.
you are under the false belief that the big guys are more likely to score a KO, & you are wrong.
Wait until this PPV on Nov. 13th. I am positive you will not only see the four WORST fights of the year....but that NONE of them end in a convincing knockout.
Also....talk about "damage".
The smaller guys inflict FAR MORE damage on each other.
Look at the ring tragedies....virtually none are from the heavyweight division.
And what "ring tragedies" do you refer to?
Comment
-
"And what "ring tragedies" do you refer to?"
Mancini-Kim
Davila-Bejines
Benn-McClellan
Pintor-Owens
Ruelas-Garcia
There are countless others.
Note : I am in no way glorifying these tragedies.
They're all horrible.
But, I'm using them as points to refute the misinformed notion that the big guys do more harm than the smaller guys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by joseOoh im scared
Comment
Comment