Who were you more impressed with last night? Dawson or Vitali

[Jim Jeffries]

Well you have a prime, undefeated, 26 year old Dawson beating a 40 year old Tarver that was smoked by an old Hopkins moving up two weight classes, over 2 years ago. And on the other, a 37 year old Vitali, after 4 years without a single fight, beating a 28 year old, #2 HW in the world.

And you're question my pick as to which win was more impressive?

[Scott9945]

Well you have a prime, undefeated, 26 year old Dawson beating a 40 year old Tarver that was smoked by an old Hopkins moving up two weight classes, over 2 years ago. And on the other, a 37 year old Vitali, after 4 years without a single fight, beating a 28 year old, #2 HW in the world.

And you're question my pick as to which win was more impressive?

I have to agree with that. There really is no comparison.

[BrooklynBomber]

I assume the 7 for Vitali (Precision voted for Vitali by accident) are the Easterm European nuthuggers? like Tunney, WLAD OWNS etc.

And the ones who voted for Dawson are american nuthuggers, I assume?

[The Gully Gad]

Well you have a prime, undefeated, 26 year old Dawson beating a 40 year old Tarver that was smoked by an old Hopkins moving up two weight classes, over 2 years ago. And on the other, a 37 year old Vitali, after 4 years without a single fight, beating a 28 year old, #2 HW in the world.

And you're question my pick as to which win was more impressive?

**** when my man says it like that anyone picking Dawson would look like a muppet...

Ur right its VK....

[Jim Jeffries]

I have to agree with that. There really is no comparison.

I like Dawson. I think he's the future of the LHW division, along with maybe Dirrell. I think Chad would outpoint Kessler, and probably be more than the declining Calzaghe could handle at this point. Tarver was a good win, but what Vitali did was historic in several ways.

[El Dominicano]

Personally I thought Vitali looked awesome but I was more impressed with Dawson, Dawson dominated a live opponent that had just beat well regarded Clinton Woods, Tarver is more skilled than Peter is. Vitali was impressive in that after 4 year lay off he dominated a Titlest for every round but the titlest wasn't the greatest, Peter can **** but that's about it.

Vitali simply because I didn't expect him to be this good considering the 4 year lay off. Dawson was same ol Dawson...I didn't see much difference.

[!! Mr. Soprano]

Top shape, young, prime Dawson beating up a slower, over the hill, and already schooled by Hopkins Tarver, is not as impressive as a 37 year old Vitali, coming out of a 4 year retirement, and putting on a clinic performance, and making a reigning champion quit on his stool.


VITALI

[BattlingNelson]

Vitali coming through camp was most impressive.

[Sweet Pea 50]

Vitali coming through camp was most impressive.

When Vit was walking to the ring, I kept on saying "Please don't trip, please don't trip, please don't trip....."

[Joe2608]

Dawson for me. He dominated Tarver who is a more live opponent. Vitali's was good too but i just think the style was all wrong for Peter.