Mexico, 22 vs Puerto Rico, 41 - Lets name the Fights

[theplayerpimp]

i stopped trying to reason with him... the dude has no logic. Its amazing to see people who appreciate boxing and ppl who appreciate the fighters they root for. Puerto Rico holds a huge chunk of boxing history, as has Mexico.

its incredible to see that some ppl cannot admit that PR being such a tiny island, and having such a huge presence and influence in boxing is nothing short of remarkable.

Same with DR and baseball... there are many examples.

coming from some who says pr is neck to neck with mexico and even ahead. Gtfo

[theplayerpimp]

what about Chavez' resume is clearly better than Tito's? be specific

let me see flirting with an 100 and 0 record. Beating guys like camacho, rosario, jose luis ramirez, haugen, taylor, lockridge, mayweather and more. Just on sheer volume and consistency.

[machotime]

let me see flirting with an 100 and 0 record. Beating guys like camacho, rosario, jose luis ramirez, haugen, taylor, lockridge, mayweather and more. Just on sheer volume and consistency.

Taylor was robbed... whitaker was a wipe out, Frankie Randall was a wipe out. Mayweather was not that good. His best win was over Camacho. Dont get me wrong, he is an all time great, but JCC's record was 70% mexican weekend fighters with losing records. And thats coming from an adamant JCC fan.

[SirTomJones]

Viva Mexico!!!!!

[El Chicano]

PR - 4M people

Mexico - 115M people

Fact - Essentially, there are 29 Puerto Rico's inside of Mexico.

Question - Does Mexico have anywhere near 29 times more boxing champions than PR???

Thank you.

Get outta here with that bull**** already... that's completely irrelevant.

Still doesn't change the fact that in all significant fights between Mexicans and P Ricans, Mexicans have prevailed.

[cyberthugpatrol]

Mexico owns puerto rico

[BorderPatrol]

Get outta here with that bull**** already... that's completely irrelevant.

Still doesn't change the fact that in all significant fights between Mexicans and P Ricans, Mexicans have prevailed.

?

Problem:

All of the fights PR wins against Mexico, you claim are NOT significant.

Tito over Vargas, or Gomez over 18 Mexicans etc etc

How is JuanMa VS De Leon or Rafa, less significant than Lopez Vs Salido??

How is Margarito via plaster over Cotto significant?

How is Segura beating a 36 year old smaller fighter, significant?

You have a funny way of looking at life my friend.

Any fight that does not favor Mexico is deemed "insignificant" by the mexicans....

[machotime]

Get outta here with that bull**** already... that's completely irrelevant.

Still doesn't change the fact that in all significant fights between Mexicans and P Ricans, Mexicans have prevailed.

check your stats before you speak. they look something like.....

PR - 44
Mexico - 37

No soup fo u!

[BorderPatrol]

Tito vs Campas 50-0 was somehow "insignificant" as per the Mexican litmus test.


LMAO.

[ELHURACAN58]

Get outta here with that bull**** already... that's completely irrelevant.

Still doesn't change the fact that in all significant fights between Mexicans and P Ricans, Mexicans have prevailed.

Their only significant for you when the mexican prevails. Would like to see who actually had Salido winning.