Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mexico, 22 vs Puerto Rico, 41 - Lets name the Fights

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by BorderPatrol View Post
    But you simply cannot discount that because Mexico has 20 times the population of Puerto Rico, that they therefore enjoy better odds of finding talent out of that bigger human pool.

    You have a box of oranges with 111 vs a box of Oranges with 4. Which box do you really think has a better chance of producing more odds that you will find a perfect orange?

    Simple math.
    Ya I get what your saying.. I do.. Your country, if your talented your
    gonna be seen for the most part.. Like here in America, if your talented at something like boxing for example you will get noticed.. In Mexico you
    would have to come from the major city's to be noticed.. Rightnow
    usain bolt is the fastest man in The world but who knows that there's some African in Africa that is faster but he comes from some tribe and will never ever be exposed as the faster man... My point is ya we have a bigger population but you guys have a better structure when it comes to notice or putting that talent in the light of
    day.. You guys do more with your little population then we do.. That's a fact.. It also sounds like a excuse so that why I feel salty saying it.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Heart and Soul View Post
      oh so now we are talking about accomplishments???

      I thought it was a head to head comparison.

      Please tell me which exactly is the argument here , because you are confusing me.

      is it head to head. is it current champs , is it achievements , which one is it bro??

      I am talking bout Chavez never fighting Tito , which is answering back at chaez>>> any rican fighter in history.

      Which is it man
      Bro, he is a practitioner of denial. He will never admit that you have a point.

      Chavez would have been destroyed by Tito.

      Tito > Mexico.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BorderPatrol View Post
        Bro, he is a practitioner of denial. He will never admit that you have a point.

        Chavez would have been destroyed by Tito.

        Tito > Mexico.
        Is Tito really your guys best fighter of all time?.. Wow

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Fresno View Post
          Is Tito really your guys best fighter of all time?.. Wow
          Does he really need to be our best fighter of all time to beat chavez???

          Did last nights fight not prove anything to you.

          You cannot be so dumb.

          is about styles.

          Cotto > Margarito , skill "wise". But we all saw what happened.

          Talent does not always win you fights. And I think that has been proved over and over again since forever.

          or do you not see it like that?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Heart and Soul View Post


            Im not understanding you buddy.

            fact is Chavez never fought Tito. So that Chavez >>> any rican fighter in history is kind of not fair to say.

            I have explained like 4 times already. Its getting tired seeing you drift away from it.
            so just bc some one doesnt fight another fighter that means one is not better than the other? So since chavez never fought lets say ricky hatton he is not considered better by the general public? yeah ok

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BorderPatrol View Post
              Bro, he is a practitioner of denial. He will never admit that you have a point.

              Chavez would have been destroyed by Tito.

              Tito > Mexico.
              LOL , dude you are a mastermind.

              But dont get them irritated , I want to have a serious debate here. And if they get irritated it wont happen.

              it will end up in eyebrows , foodstamps and tacos.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by theplayerpimp View Post
                so just bc some one doesnt fight another fighter that means one is not better than the other? So since chavez never fought lets say ricky hatton he is not considered better by the general public? yeah ok




                Comment


                • Originally posted by theplayerpimp View Post
                  overall chams you serious? Marquez > any rican right now and its not even debatable. Sanchez and chavez> any rican in history that is just being honest.
                  Actually, we can talk about Chavez all day long... I probably know more about Chavez' career than you do. Truth is that Chavez is a great... TBH, one of my favorite fighters. That said, he fought A LOT of bums and no-names. 60-70% of his record is composed with mexican weekend fighters.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by BorderPatrol View Post
                    Bro, he is a practitioner of denial. He will never admit that you have a point.

                    Chavez would have been destroyed by Tito.

                    Tito > Mexico.
                    yeah way to go genius chavez who fought like 90 percent of his fights at 140 wasnt successful any higher than that would be a good fight against tito who started at 147 pounds and had success at 160. Way to go.

                    Comment


                    • Fck rivalry, I just thank Ortiz for giving his best performance and giving us great fight. Salido did his thing too but I didnt watch that one, overall great night for boxing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP