Is the WBA the WORST Sanctioning body right now?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kris Silver
    Kneel 4 Silver,good boy!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 7798
    • 1,073
    • 3,581
    • 27,245

    #21
    Originally posted by blackirish137
    You know whats sad? The IBO is actually probebly the least corrupt, overall best belt in boxing. yet I will never accept it as a legitimate belt, simply because we would end up having 5 belts in each division. which would be disgusting.

    the WBA and WBO belts are by far the worst belts out there, with the WBA in first place. I think the IBF is probebly the best belt, but its still garbage.

    it makes me laugh how easy it is to become a 'world champion' nowadays.
    I was slightly positive about the IBO belt awhile ago as it seems the least corrupt. However most of them started that way, it's not that different. How does a start off grow, be better than the rest, and only worsen and sell out when you can.

    So I don't have a lot of faith in the IBO somehow rescuing or improving things, the contrary mostly.

    I think a lot of people are disillusioned with the sport right now, there's like 5 champions in each division, what is that all about and how does a regular or mainstream viewer understand this complex garbage? They don't, they don't bother with the sport or become regulars.

    If you ask me all the organisations may think their earning more money with dodgy rankings, mandatories, numerous belts and levels of them and more, but ultimately it's these things that's put people of the sport thus a smaller pie of money for them. The whole sport suffers however, especially the boxers and the fans.
    Last edited by Kris Silver; 10-26-2008, 04:14 PM.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP