Yes Tito was considered the best in the world and Hopkins was an unheralded long reigning champion.
Maybe it just shows the overall ignorance of American boxing journo's. You tell me.
No, it just means they were wrong. Or no more ignorant than the fools who thought Hatton would beat Floyd.
Perhaps they were biased or, more than likely, they WERE biased. But that doesn't mean they don't "recognize" the other guy. A lot of people recognized Antonio Margarito and picked Cotto to win anyway. That's boxing.
Seriously man, sometimes you just need to stop and think clearly for a second. But your bias is so entrenched you take the conversation elsewhere. I coudl start any subject and expect you to jump in with Jeff Lacy. ****, I could be talking about Manny Pacquiao. Well, maybe not since I wouldn't even find you on a Pacquiao thread.
And to recognize means to know when a non-pound for pound fighter is going to lose or win. Stop being such a ****** Yank and learn something .
Oh no you're right. You know you must be recognised and respected when 99% of Yank boxing journo's predict you'll get destroyed by someone with Lacy's extensive pedigreee.
Comment