talyors resume is already 10 times better than joes
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I actually think the best resumes go in this order.
Calzaghe
Pavlik
Taylor
I disagree with the topic creator, because Taylor was fighting small welterweights and taylors best win was against hopkins and some people felt he lost both of those fights.... Better resume then calzaghe? Far from it unless you consider a good win of Taylors to be little man spinks. All three are good fighters though, I don't think anyone should say they say they suck. Though Calzaghe is ****ing his legacy up by choosing a so called a shadow former-self of roy jones jr(thats what calz said in his book)Comment
-
Comment
-
I missed the post after but I will reply here. My point was how do you write off Miranda and inculde Reid in the conversation. Neither guy is any better or worse then the other. Either time each of them has steped in the ring with a legit world class fighter they have lost. Just cause Reid happened to win a title from Giovanni Pretorius and lost it to the like of Thulani Malinga, it does not make him a more legitimate opponent then Miranda.Comment
-
Eubank was good enough to go to Germany and win a decision over Rochigianni, who was unbeaten at the time and went on to beat Michael Nunn for the WBC title. Eubank also beat Thulani Malinga and Michael Watson.
After the Calzaghe fight, he stepped to cruiserweight and lost a very close decision. In the rematch he was ahead on points but was stopped on cuts.
As for Eubank being a British hypejob, Eubank vs Benn was a meeting between two of the best middleweights in the world, but American TV had no interest in showing it because they thought Benn would KO Eubank early like he was doing to everyone else.
Some hypejob.Comment
-
Ried = who the hell is that
Hopkins = 43 and knocked him down and has a case that he won that fight
Kessler= Best win Mundine says a lotComment
Comment