The Best fighter to keep it simple?

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 3
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • ferocity
    NOV. 3, NEW CHAMPION
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 15629
    • 313
    • 257
    • 23,031
    #21
    Originally posted by Ryn0
    Few of them fighters "kept it simple" Joe Louis didn't keep it simple watch this:


    Lennox, Evander, Hagler, Hearns are some of the best fighters that "kept it simple" I disagrree with Hagler and Evander, Hearn yeah he used his height, reach and just threw them down the middle or to the side.


    Hagler and Evander especially Evander had to work for his win and was techniqually sound as with Hagler. Who could box too.

      Comment

      • cotto16
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 2097
        • 26
        • 28
        • 8,852
        #22
        Originally posted by RunW/Knives
        What comes to my mind when I read the question......was limitation.

        There was nothing special about Monzon. He wasn't a big guy, he wasn't a very strong guy, he wasn't fast..........he just got the job done.
        Couldnt agree more

          Comment

          • DiegoFuego
            Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2005
            • 17338
            • 1,403
            • 586
            • 24,657
            #23
            I have never seen Pavlik do anything even remotely impressive in a fight other than take a good punch and get off the canvas. He takes the cake easily for being a simple fighter who somehow made it big.

              Comment

                • Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                Working...
                TOP