Why is Joe Calzaghes Reply to Pavlik the same? he always brings up Kessler.

[abadger]

Joe C would be 100x more popular if he just didnt talk. He cannot promote himself he's terrible he just doesn't have that flair.

He used to be even worse. Today's Joe is him trying to be marketable. He fails.

[Pullcounter]

Joe C reply is getting a bit played out he always says Is Pavlik as good as kessler? and then he mentions to pavlik is jermain taylor as good as kessler? he did the same thing to B hop he kept saying is so and so on your resume as good as kessler? and b hop said who is kessler?

No offense Kessler is a good boxer but Joe C is basically saying kessler this and that what for? he acts like Kessler is some kinda ATG legend.

just because kessler is better than pavlik doesn't mean calzaghe should duck him. i mean, why not fight him and get paid?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

just because kessler is better than pavlik doesn't mean calzaghe should duck him. i mean, why not fight him and get paid?

I believe he's getting paid very handsomely for fighting Roy. Significantly more than fighting Youngstown.

[Zocalo]

Well he thinks that Kessler is a great win that is why... he is a good win but nothing to go OMG about.

[El Dominicano]

Joe C reply is getting a bit played out he always says Is Pavlik as good as kessler? and then he mentions to pavlik is jermain taylor as good as kessler? he did the same thing to B hop he kept saying is so and so on your resume as good as kessler? and b hop said who is kessler?

No offense Kessler is a good boxer but Joe C is basically saying kessler this and that what for? he acts like Kessler is some kinda ATG legend.

Well said Domain. I agree he uses Kessler as his shield against facing good opposition. Little does he know Kessler is as unproven as Lacy

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Well said Domain. I agree he uses Kessler as his shield against facing good opposition. Little does he know Kessler is as unproven as Lacy

And as unproven as Pavlik.

Oh no wait.........beating Taylor makes you proven. Sorry, silly me.

[El Dominicano]

And as unproven as Pavlik.

Oh no wait.........beating Taylor makes you proven. Sorry, silly me.

No beating unproven Kessler/Lacy and 43 Y/o B-Hop does. That is a GREAT thing to accomplish and I would put you on the number 2 spot lolz

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No beating unproven Kessler/Lacy and 43 Y/o B-Hop does. That is a GREAT thing to accomplish and I would put you on the number 2 spot lolz

Actually I have Joe No.1

I respect more the fact that Joe has been consistent for so many years at the top of his division. Complacency is the hardest thing to fight against in boxing. His division wasnt the best but neither was Hopkins' but I respect both guys a hell of a lot more than Kelly ****in Pavlik.

When he makes more than 1 ****ty defence of his belts then start talking.

[dstew]

Well said Domain. I agree he uses Kessler as his shield against facing good opposition. Little does he know Kessler is as unproven as Lacy

I don't understand a lot of the Kessler nuthugging given the easy path he's taking since fighting Calzaghe, and I realize that his resume isn't stacked with elite fighters, but to say he is as unproven as Lacy is pretty ignorant.

[KnockoutTheFat]

He used to be even worse. Today's Joe is him trying to be marketable. He fails.

Why do you have a pic in your avatar of Roy Jones holding his huge **** (no ****)?