Why is Joe Calzaghes Reply to Pavlik the same? he always brings up Kessler.

[Mozza]

We had this discussion before, arrogant *****.
Don't tell me what I do and do not believe. Speak for yourself, not others.

I'll call things exactly as I see them and you are quite obviously lying, or at least deliberately exaggerating, in order to score cheap points.

You think Hop only landed one clean shot? When he was landing clean shots in almost every round up until late? But you register the crap Joe threw as clean?

The point I was making is that if Calzaghe's clean shots can be counted on one hand then proprtoinally Hopkins could be counted on one finger. Realistically I know Hopkins landed more than one clean punch just as you know Calzaghe scored more than a handful.

You are on another level of blind. You need vision worse than Stevie and Ray put together.

Good job I'm not colour blind though otherwise I would miss out on the random emphasis in your posts.

Funniest **** I ever read on this board.

You don't read much then. No great surprise.

I will go back and rewatch the fight. I will come back tomorrow and identify the times in each round that Hop lands clean.

Have fun.

All you need to do is find the point in the fight where Sloppy Joe ever came close to stopping your boy with his cuffing, grazing, comical bull****.

That's easy, just before he took five minutes to recover from an invisible punch.

Deal?

Done

Hop said he was legitimately low-blowed. But mind games are his speciality too so don't flatter Sloppy Joe by pretending that **** represented any kind of near stoppage situation. Because that's a ****ing joke. Watch the tape.

Ah, so he conveniently started playing mind games at the time he looked most vulnerable. A likely story.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Watch Bernard's work in that fight. You're watching a master of the game.[/B]

His holding, headbutting and pretending to be hit low like a ***** was masterful.