[QUOTE=Jupiter Maximus;4083708]I would doubt that he has an excuse. Peden had his number, thats all. That doesn't change the fact that Nate beat a better fighter in Diaz, does it? doesn't change the fact that Nate said he would beat diaz at his own fight and did it, does it? Truth is, I picked Diaz by UD. I thought Nate would be wore down. But he beat the younger, fresher fighter who most thought was the best in the division. The Peden fights cannot change that.
Why are people so high on Nate Cambell
Collapse
-
Nate Campbell is the ****!! For someone who beat one of my favorite boxers in Juan Diaz, he deserves all the credit for being one of the best in the world at 135. Who cares if he lost before, what is so cool about Nate is that he is willing to fight anyone at anytime. Nate is good for boxing unlike some chicken**** boxers who are undefeated and won't fight someone good in fear of losing that '0'.
For the haters.........Nate has 3 belts....what do you have? End of storyComment
Comment